mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Models and Mechanisms for Spatial Data Fairness

arXiv 2204.01880 ↗First posted 4 Apr 2022cs.DB cs.LGcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Fairness in data-driven decision-making studies scenarios where individuals from certain population segments may be unfairly treated when being considered for loan or job applications, access to public resources, or other types of services. In location-based applications, decisions are based on individual whereabouts, which often correlate with sensitive attributes such as race, income, and education. While fairness has received significant attention recently, e.g., in machine learning, there is little focus on achieving fairness when dealing with location data. Due to their characteristics and specific type of processing algorithms, location data pose important fairness challenges. We introduce the concept of spatial data fairness to address the specific challenges of location data and spatial queries. We devise a novel building block to achieve fairness in the form of fair polynomials. Next, we propose two mechanisms based on fair polynomials that achieve individual spatial fairness, corresponding to two common location-based decision-making types: distance-based and zone-based. Extensive experimental results on real data show that the proposed mechanisms achieve spatial fairness without sacrificing utility.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Apr 2022.

Builds on

12 of 30 references.

References · 12

  1. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
  2. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
  3. 2016Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instrumentscited by 671
  4. 2017Fairness in Criminal Justice Risk Assessments: The State of the Artcited by 315
  5. 2020Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 194
  6. 2018Equity of Attention: Amortizing Individual Fairness in Rankingscited by 124
  7. 2021Fairness in Rankings and Recommendations: An Overviewcited by 62
  8. 2020Individual Fairness for k-Clusteringcited by 56
  9. 2022Algorithmic Fairness Datasets: the Story so Farcited by 51
  10. 2020A Notion of Individual Fairness for Clusteringcited by 20
  11. 2019Preference-Informed Fairnesscited by 15
  12. 2021KKT Conditions, First-Order and Second-Order Optimization, and Distributed Optimization: Tutorial and Surveycited by 14

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

3 papers.