Measuring the Impact of Taxes and Public Services on Property Values: A Double Machine Learning Approach
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
How do property prices respond to changes in local taxes and local public services? Attempts to measure this, starting with Oates (1969), have suffered from a lack of local public service controls. Recent work attempts to overcome such data limitations through the use of quasi-experimental methods. We revisit this fundamental problem, but adopt a different empirical strategy that pairs the double machine learning estimator of Chernozhukov et al. (2018) with a novel dataset of 947 time-varying local characteristic and public service controls for all municipalities in Sweden over the 2010-2016 period. We find that properly controlling for local public service and characteristic controls more than doubles the estimated impact of local income taxes on house prices. We also exploit the unique features of our dataset to demonstrate that tax capitalization is stronger in areas with greater municipal competition, providing support for a core implication of the Tiebout hypothesis. Finally, we measure the impact of public services, education, and crime on house prices and the effect of local taxes on migration.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 109 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Mar 2022.
Builds on
7 of 109 references.
References · 7
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2016Wide & Deep Learning for Recommender Systemscited by 745
- 2017Nonparametric regression using deep neural networks with ReLU activation functioncited by 431
- 2016Generalized Random Forestscited by 309
- 2017Double/Debiased/Neyman Machine Learning of Treatment Effectscited by 76
- 2018Deep Neural Networks for Estimation and Inferencecited by 62
- 2015Uniform Inference in High-dimensional Dynamic Panel Data Modelscited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.