mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Subjective Evaluation of Deep Learning Models for Symbolic Music Composition

arXiv 2203.14641 ↗First posted 28 Mar 2022cs.SD cs.AIcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep learning models are typically evaluated to measure and compare their performance on a given task. The metrics that are commonly used to evaluate these models are standard metrics that are used for different tasks. In the field of music composition or generation, the standard metrics used in other fields have no clear meaning in terms of music theory. In this paper, we propose a subjective method to evaluate AI-based music composition systems by asking questions related to basic music principles to different levels of users based on their musical experience and knowledge. We use this method to compare state-of-the-art models for music composition with deep learning. We give the results of this evaluation method and we compare the responses of each user level for each evaluated model.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 18 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Mar 2022.

Builds on

10 of 18 references.

References · 10

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2013Auto-Encoding Variational Bayescited by 3,980
  3. 2018Enabling Factorized Piano Music Modeling and Generation with the MAESTRO Datasetcited by 215
  4. 2018Music Transformercited by 207
  5. 2017MuseGAN: Multi-track Sequential Generative Adversarial Networks for Symbolic Music Generation and Accompanimentcited by 151
  6. 2018A Hierarchical Latent Vector Model for Learning Long-Term Structure in Musiccited by 131
  7. 2016DeepBach: a Steerable Model for Bach Chorales Generationcited by 90
  8. 2020A Comprehensive Survey on Deep Music Generation: Multi-level Representations, Algorithms, Evaluations, and Future Directionscited by 56
  9. 2020MMM : Exploring Conditional Multi-Track Music Generation with the Transformercited by 48
  10. 2021Music Composition with Deep Learning: A Reviewcited by 12

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 2.

5 papers.