mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Recent Few-Shot Object Detection Algorithms: A Survey with Performance Comparison

arXiv 2203.14205 ↗First posted 27 Mar 2022cs.CVcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The generic object detection (GOD) task has been successfully tackled by recent deep neural networks, trained by an avalanche of annotated training samples from some common classes. However, it is still non-trivial to generalize these object detectors to the novel long-tailed object classes, which have only few labeled training samples. To this end, the Few-Shot Object Detection (FSOD) has been topical recently, as it mimics the humans' ability of learning to learn, and intelligently transfers the learned generic object knowledge from the common heavy-tailed, to the novel long-tailed object classes. Especially, the research in this emerging field has been flourishing in recent years with various benchmarks, backbones, and methodologies proposed. To review these FSOD works, there are several insightful FSOD survey articles [58, 59, 74, 78] that systematically study and compare them as the groups of fine-tuning/transfer learning, and meta-learning methods. In contrast, we review the existing FSOD algorithms from a new perspective under a new taxonomy based on their contributions, i.e., data-oriented, model-oriented, and algorithm-oriented. Thus, a comprehensive survey with performance comparison is conducted on recent achievements of FSOD. Furthermore, we also analyze the technical challenges, the merits and demerits of these methods, and envision the future directions of FSOD. Specifically, we give an overview of FSOD, including the problem definition, common datasets, and evaluation protocols. The taxonomy is then proposed that groups FSOD methods into three types. Following this taxonomy, we provide a systematic review of the advances in FSOD. Finally, further discussions on performance, challenges, and future directions are presented.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 128 of its 186 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Mar 2022.

Builds on

128 of 186 references.

References · 128

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  4. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  5. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  6. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,082
  7. 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,282
  8. 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,617
  9. 2020End-to-End Object Detection with Transformerscited by 7,384
  10. 2017Mask R-CNNcited by 7,259
  11. 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,893
  12. 2022Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5,603
38 more
  1. 2016Feature Pyramid Networks for Object Detectioncited by 5,021
  2. 2017Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning for Fast Adaptation of Deep Networkscited by 4,861
  3. 2015You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detectioncited by 4,829
  4. 2017Squeeze-and-Excitation Networkscited by 4,763
  5. 2013Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionalitycited by 3,462
  6. 2020Deformable DETR: Deformable Transformers for End-to-End Object Detectioncited by 3,410
  7. 2015SSD: Single Shot MultiBox Detectorcited by 3,125
  8. 2017Prototypical Networks for Few-shot Learningcited by 3,001
  9. 2015Fast R-CNNcited by 2,930
  10. 2015FaceNet: A Unified Embedding for Face Recognition and Clusteringcited by 2,833
  11. 2020Supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 2,803
  12. 2018YOLOv3: An Incremental Improvementcited by 2,652
  13. 2017Non-local Neural Networkscited by 2,290
  14. 2016Matching Networks for One Shot Learningcited by 2,246
  15. 2013Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentationcited by 2,160
  16. 2020YOLOv4: Optimal Speed and Accuracy of Object Detectioncited by 1,624
  17. 2019FCOS: Fully Convolutional One-Stage Object Detectioncited by 1,573
  18. 2016YOLO9000: Better, Faster, Strongercited by 1,429
  19. 2019Objects as Pointscited by 1,172
  20. 2017Learning to Compare: Relation Network for Few-Shot Learningcited by 1,139
  21. 2019EfficientDet: Scalable and Efficient Object Detectioncited by 1,018
  22. 2018On First-Order Meta-Learning Algorithmscited by 1,003
  23. 2017A Survey on Multi-Task Learningcited by 838
  24. 2018Path Aggregation Network for Instance Segmentationcited by 796
  25. 2018CornerNet: Detecting Objects as Paired Keypointscited by 763
  26. 2014Spatial Pyramid Pooling in Deep Convolutional Networks for Visual Recognitioncited by 719
  27. 2019A Closer Look at Few-shot Classificationcited by 679
  28. 2019CenterNet: Keypoint Triplets for Object Detectioncited by 654
  29. 2014Neural Turing Machinescited by 630
  30. 2019Bridging the Gap Between Anchor-based and Anchor-free Detection via Adaptive Training Sample Selectioncited by 539
  31. 2019Object Detection in 20 Years: A Surveycited by 528
  32. 2018Object Detection with Deep Learning: A Reviewcited by 524
  33. 2019Generalizing from a Few Examples: A Survey on Few-Shot Learningcited by 462
  34. 2021Conditional DETR for Fast Training Convergencecited by 422
  35. 2018Deep Learning for Generic Object Detection: A Surveycited by 392
  36. 2018Dynamic Few-Shot Visual Learning without Forgettingcited by 385
  37. 2017Soft-NMS -- Improving Object Detection With One Line of Codecited by 380
  38. 2019Dynamic Convolution: Attention over Convolution Kernelscited by 355

50 most cited of 128 All 128 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 3; 2025: 3.

8 papers.