mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Kullback-Leibler control for discrete-time nonlinear systems on continuous spaces

arXiv 2203.12864 ↗First posted 24 Mar 2022eess.SY cs.LG cs.SYcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Kullback-Leibler (KL) control enables efficient numerical methods for nonlinear optimal control problems. The crucial assumption of KL control is the full controllability of the transition distribution. However, this assumption is often violated when the dynamics evolves in a continuous space. Consequently, applying KL control to problems with continuous spaces requires some approximation, which leads to the lost of the optimality. To avoid such approximation, in this paper, we reformulate the KL control problem for continuous spaces so that it does not require unrealistic assumptions. The key difference between the original and reformulated KL control is that the former measures the control effort by KL divergence between controlled and uncontrolled transition distributions while the latter replaces the uncontrolled transition by a noise-driven transition. We show that the reformulated KL control admits efficient numerical algorithms like the original one without unreasonable assumptions. Specifically, the associated value function can be computed by using a Monte Carlo method based on its path integral representation.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Mar 2022.

Builds on

4 of 25 references.

References · 4

  1. 2018A Tour of Reinforcement Learning: The View from Continuous Controlcited by 151
  2. 2019Deep Learning Theory Review: An Optimal Control and Dynamical Systems Perspectivecited by 27
  3. 2016Noise Response Data Reveal Novel Controllability Gramian for Nonlinear Network Dynamicscited by 2
  4. 2021Sparse optimal stochastic controlcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

6 papers.