mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Multidimensional Belief Quantification for Label-Efficient Meta-Learning

arXiv 2203.12768 ↗First posted 23 Mar 2022cs.CVcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Optimization-based meta-learning offers a promising direction for few-shot learning that is essential for many real-world computer vision applications. However, learning from few samples introduces uncertainty, and quantifying model confidence for few-shot predictions is essential for many critical domains. Furthermore, few-shot tasks used in meta training are usually sampled randomly from a task distribution for an iterative model update, leading to high labeling costs and computational overhead in meta-training. We propose a novel uncertainty-aware task selection model for label efficient meta-learning. The proposed model formulates a multidimensional belief measure, which can quantify the known uncertainty and lower bound the unknown uncertainty of any given task. Our theoretical result establishes an important relationship between the conflicting belief and the incorrect belief. The theoretical result allows us to estimate the total uncertainty of a task, which provides a principled criterion for task selection. A novel multi-query task formulation is further developed to improve both the computational and labeling efficiency of meta-learning. Experiments conducted over multiple real-world few-shot image classification tasks demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed model.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Mar 2022.

Builds on

30 of 42 references.

References · 30

  1. 2017Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning for Fast Adaptation of Deep Networkscited by 4,861
  2. 2017Prototypical Networks for Few-shot Learningcited by 3,001
  3. 2016Matching Networks for One Shot Learningcited by 2,246
  4. 2017Learning to Compare: Relation Network for Few-Shot Learningcited by 1,139
  5. 2018On First-Order Meta-Learning Algorithmscited by 1,003
  6. 2018Evidential Deep Learning to Quantify Classification Uncertaintycited by 728
  7. 2018Conditional Neural Processescited by 421
  8. 2018Meta-learning with differentiable closed-form solverscited by 395
  9. 2017Meta-SGD: Learning to Learn Quickly for Few-Shot Learningcited by 377
  10. 2019Deep Evidential Regressioncited by 354
  11. 2017Few-Shot Learning with Graph Neural Networkscited by 324
  12. 2019Meta-Dataset: A Dataset of Datasets for Learning to Learn from Few Examplescited by 312
18 more
  1. 2018How to train your MAMLcited by 306
  2. 2018Meta-Transfer Learning for Few-Shot Learningcited by 306
  3. 2019Attentive Neural Processescited by 280
  4. 2017Meta Networkscited by 268
  5. 2018Probabilistic Model-Agnostic Meta-Learningcited by 254
  6. 2018Bayesian Model-Agnostic Meta-Learningcited by 194
  7. 2018Recasting Gradient-Based Meta-Learning as Hierarchical Bayescited by 180
  8. 2019Convolutional Conditional Neural Processescited by 139
  9. 2019Edge-labeling Graph Neural Network for Few-shot Learningcited by 114
  10. 2018Meta-Learning Probabilistic Inference For Predictioncited by 108
  11. 2019Multimodal Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning via Task-Aware Modulationcited by 103
  12. 2020Meta-Learning with Adaptive Hyperparameterscited by 79
  13. 2019Hierarchically Structured Meta-learningcited by 67
  14. 2019Learning to Balance: Bayesian Meta-Learning for Imbalanced and Out-of-distribution Taskscited by 48
  15. 2020Adaptive Task Sampling for Meta-Learningcited by 29
  16. 2019Uncertainty in Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning using Variational Inferencecited by 23
  17. 2020Probabilistic Active Meta-Learningcited by 23
  18. 2020Information-theoretic Task Selection for Meta-Reinforcement Learningcited by 10

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

9 papers.