mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

ReCCoVER: Detecting Causal Confusion for Explainable Reinforcement Learning

arXiv 2203.11211 ↗First posted 21 Mar 2022cs.LG cs.AIcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Despite notable results in various fields over the recent years, deep reinforcement learning (DRL) algorithms lack transparency, affecting user trust and hindering their deployment to high-risk tasks. Causal confusion refers to a phenomenon where an agent learns spurious correlations between features which might not hold across the entire state space, preventing safe deployment to real tasks where such correlations might be broken. In this work, we examine whether an agent relies on spurious correlations in critical states, and propose an alternative subset of features on which it should base its decisions instead, to make it less susceptible to causal confusion. Our goal is to increase transparency of DRL agents by exposing the influence of learned spurious correlations on its decisions, and offering advice to developers about feature selection in different parts of state space, to avoid causal confusion. We propose ReCCoVER, an algorithm which detects causal confusion in agent's reasoning before deployment, by executing its policy in alternative environments where certain correlations between features do not hold. We demonstrate our approach in taxi and grid world environments, where ReCCoVER detects states in which an agent relies on spurious correlations and offers a set of features that should be considered instead.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Mar 2022.

Builds on

15 of 23 references.

References · 15

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  2. 2013Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 3,274
  3. 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,371
  4. 2016OpenAI Gymcited by 1,736
  5. 2019Causal Confusion in Imitation Learningcited by 288
  6. 2020A Survey on the Explainability of Supervised Machine Learningcited by 227
  7. 2018Programmatically Interpretable Reinforcement Learningcited by 193
  8. 2019Explainable Reinforcement Learning Through a Causal Lenscited by 177
  9. 2017Visualizing and Understanding Atari Agentscited by 141
  10. 2020Explainable Reinforcement Learning: A Surveycited by 141
  11. 2019Interestingness Elements for Explainable Reinforcement Learning: Understanding Agents' Capabilities and Limitationscited by 50
  12. 2019Explain Your Move: Understanding Agent Actions Using Specific and Relevant Feature Attributioncited by 50
3 more
  1. 2018Contrastive Explanations for Reinforcement Learning in terms of Expected Consequencescited by 44
  2. 2019Counterfactual States for Atari Agents via Generative Deep Learningcited by 14
  3. 2021Contrastive Explanations for Comparing Preferences of Reinforcement Learning Agentscited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

4 papers.