mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Half-Inverse Gradients for Physical Deep Learning

arXiv 2203.10131 ↗First posted 18 Mar 2022cs.LG physics.comp-phcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent works in deep learning have shown that integrating differentiable physics simulators into the training process can greatly improve the quality of results. Although this combination represents a more complex optimization task than supervised neural network training, the same gradient-based optimizers are typically employed to minimize the loss function. However, the integrated physics solvers have a profound effect on the gradient flow as manipulating scales in magnitude and direction is an inherent property of many physical processes. Consequently, the gradient flow is often highly unbalanced and creates an environment in which existing gradient-based optimizers perform poorly. In this work, we analyze the characteristics of both physical and neural network optimizations to derive a new method that does not suffer from this phenomenon. Our method is based on a half-inversion of the Jacobian and combines principles of both classical network and physics optimizers to solve the combined optimization task. Compared to state-of-the-art neural network optimizers, our method converges more quickly and yields better solutions, which we demonstrate on three complex learning problems involving nonlinear oscillators, the Schroedinger equation and the Poisson problem.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Mar 2022.

Builds on

21 of 52 references.

References · 21

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2018Neural Ordinary Differential Equationscited by 3,779
  3. 2014Sequence to Sequence Learning with Neural Networkscited by 2,986
  4. 2020Learning Mesh-Based Simulation with Graph Networkscited by 868
  5. 2015Optimizing Neural Networks with Kronecker-factored Approximate Curvaturecited by 796
  6. 2019Hamiltonian Neural Networkscited by 712
  7. 2016Interaction Networks for Learning about Objects, Relations and Physicscited by 509
  8. 2021Machine learning accelerated computational fluid dynamicscited by 471
  9. 2017A simple neural network module for relational reasoningcited by 346
  10. 2019DiffTaichi: Differentiable Programming for Physical Simulationcited by 258
  11. 2020Solver-in-the-Loop: Learning from Differentiable Physics to Interact with Iterative PDE-Solverscited by 205
  12. 2013Revisiting Natural Gradient for Deep Networkscited by 159
9 more
  1. 2017Practical Gauss-Newton Optimisation for Deep Learningcited by 142
  2. 2020Learning to Control PDEs with Differentiable Physicscited by 132
  3. 2016Accelerating Eulerian Fluid Simulation With Convolutional Networkscited by 130
  4. 2018Deep Dynamical Modeling and Control of Unsteady Fluid Flowscited by 68
  5. 2018SPNets: Differentiable Fluid Dynamics for Deep Neural Networkscited by 62
  6. 2020Differentiable Molecular Simulations for Control and Learningcited by 25
  7. 2016LazySVD: Even Faster SVD Decomposition Yet Without Agonizing Paincited by 22
  8. 2019JAX, M.D.: A Framework for Differentiable Physicscited by 7
  9. 2017Optimization Methods for Inverse Problemscited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

3 papers.