mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Sven: Singular Value Descent as a Computationally Efficient Natural Gradient Method

arXiv 2604.01279 ↗First posted 1 Apr 2026cs.LG cs.AI hep-thcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We introduce Sven (Singular Value dEsceNt), a new optimization algorithm for neural networks that exploits the natural decomposition of loss functions into a sum over individual data points, rather than reducing the full loss to a single scalar before computing a parameter update. Sven treats each data point's residual as a separate condition to be satisfied simultaneously, using the Moore-Penrose pseudoinverse of the loss Jacobian to find the minimum-norm parameter update that best satisfies all conditions at once. In practice, this pseudoinverse is approximated via a truncated singular value decomposition, retaining only the k most significant directions. We show that Sven can be understood as a natural gradient method generalized to the overparametrized regime, recovering natural gradient descent in the underparametrized limit. We test Sven on a variety of regression and classification tasks, including small-scale language modeling with transformers, and find that it is competitive with leading baselines such as Adam, Muon, and K-FAC. We also discuss Sven's memory overhead, which presents a barrier to scaling under a naive implementation, and introduce an optimized implementation that keeps memory usage on par with standard baselines under mild restrictions on model architecture. Beyond standard machine learning benchmarks, we anticipate that Sven will find natural application in scientific computing settings where custom loss functions decompose into several conditions.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Apr 2026.

Builds on

14 of 32 references.

References · 14

  1. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
  2. 2016Gaussian Error Linear Units (GELUs)cited by 3,431
  3. 2015Optimizing Neural Networks with Kronecker-factored Approximate Curvaturecited by 776
  4. 2017Deep Learning Scaling is Predictable, Empiricallycited by 556
  5. 2014New insights and perspectives on the natural gradient methodcited by 435
  6. 2018Shampoo: Preconditioned Stochastic Tensor Optimizationcited by 413
  7. 2024SOAP: Improving and Stabilizing Shampoo using Adamcited by 179
  8. 2019Revisiting the Polyak step sizecited by 55
  9. 2023A Survey of Geometric Optimization for Deep Learning: From Euclidean Space to Riemannian Manifoldcited by 21
  10. 2024Jacobian Descent for Multi-Objective Optimizationcited by 18
  11. 2024Exact Gauss-Newton Optimization for Training Deep Neural Networkscited by 10
  12. 2023Natural Gradient Methods: Perspectives, Efficient-Scalable Approximations, and Analysiscited by 7
2 more
  1. 2022Half-Inverse Gradients for Physical Deep Learningcited by 3
  2. 2025The Optimiser Hidden in Plain Sight: Training with the Loss Landscape's Induced Metriccited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.