mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Adversarial Robustness of Neural-Statistical Features in Detection of Generative Transformers

arXiv 2203.07983 ↗First posted 2 Mar 2022cs.CL cs.AI cs.LGcited by 25

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The detection of computer-generated text is an area of rapidly increasing significance as nascent generative models allow for efficient creation of compelling human-like text, which may be abused for the purposes of spam, disinformation, phishing, or online influence campaigns. Past work has studied detection of current state-of-the-art models, but despite a developing threat landscape, there has been minimal analysis of the robustness of detection methods to adversarial attacks. To this end, we evaluate neural and non-neural approaches on their ability to detect computer-generated text, their robustness against text adversarial attacks, and the impact that successful adversarial attacks have on human judgement of text quality. We find that while statistical features underperform neural features, statistical features provide additional adversarial robustness that can be leveraged in ensemble detection models. In the process, we find that previously effective complex phrasal features for detection of computer-generated text hold little predictive power against contemporary generative models, and identify promising statistical features to use instead. Finally, we pioneer the usage of DeltaMAUVE as a proxy measure for human judgement of adversarial text quality.

Key facts. Cited by 25 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Mar 2022.

Builds on

24 of 53 references.

References · 24

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  3. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  4. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,170
  5. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
  6. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
  7. 2019DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lightercited by 4,307
  8. 2020MiniLM: Deep Self-Attention Distillation for Task-Agnostic Compression of Pre-Trained Transformerscited by 1,463
  9. 2016Practical Black-Box Attacks against Machine Learningcited by 903
  10. 2019CTRL: A Conditional Transformer Language Model for Controllable Generationcited by 762
  11. 2020Stanza: A Python Natural Language Processing Toolkit for Many Human Languagescited by 723
  12. 2019Defending Against Neural Fake Newscited by 559
12 more
  1. 2019Release Strategies and the Social Impacts of Language Modelscited by 513
  2. 2019GLTR: Statistical Detection and Visualization of Generated Textcited by 496
  3. 2021MAUVE: Measuring the Gap Between Neural Text and Human Text using Divergence Frontierscited by 470
  4. 2018Generating Natural Language Adversarial Examplescited by 424
  5. 2018Black-box Generation of Adversarial Text Sequences to Evade Deep Learning Classifierscited by 345
  6. 2019Adversarial Attacks and Defenses in Images, Graphs and Text: A Reviewcited by 237
  7. 2020TweepFake: about Detecting Deepfake Tweetscited by 117
  8. 2017Exploring the Landscape of Spatial Robustnesscited by 81
  9. 2020Can Adversarial Weight Perturbations Inject Neural Backdoors?cited by 56
  10. 2020Attacking Neural Text Detectorscited by 39
  11. 2018Attacks on State-of-the-Art Face Recognition using Attentional Adversarial Attack Generative Networkcited by 38
  12. 2019Are Self-Driving Cars Secure? Evasion Attacks against Deep Neural Networks for Steering Angle Predictioncited by 16

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 9; 2024: 5; 2025: 6; 2026: 2.

25 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2023The Science of Detecting LLM-Generated Textscited by 128
  2. 2023A Survey on LLM-Generated Text Detection: Necessity, Methods, and Future Directionscited by 105
  3. 2022Machine Generated Text: A Comprehensive Survey of Threat Models and Detection Methodscited by 79
  4. 2023Contrasting Linguistic Patterns in Human and LLM-Generated News Textcited by 62
  5. 2023Multiscale Positive-Unlabeled Detection of AI-Generated Textscited by 61
  6. 2024M4GT-Bench: Evaluation Benchmark for Black-Box Machine-Generated Text Detectioncited by 43
  7. 2022Attribution and Obfuscation of Neural Text Authorship: A Data Mining Perspectivecited by 41
  8. 2024SemEval-2024 Task 8: Multidomain, Multimodel and Multilingual Machine-Generated Text Detectioncited by 30
  9. 2022Targeted Phishing Campaigns using Large Scale Language Modelscited by 23
  10. 2024Detecting AI-Generated Text: Factors Influencing Detectability with Current Methodscited by 23
  11. 2025AdaDetectGPT: Adaptive Detection of LLM-Generated Text with Statistical Guaranteescited by 21
  12. 2024Authorship Obfuscation in Multilingual Machine-Generated Text Detectioncited by 19
13 more
  1. 2023On the Trustworthiness Landscape of State-of-the-art Generative Models: A Survey and Outlookcited by 15
  2. 2023J-Guard: Journalism Guided Adversarially Robust Detection of AI-generated Newscited by 10
  3. 2023Towards an Understanding and Explanation for Mixed-Initiative Artificial Scientific Text Detectioncited by 8
  4. 2024ESPERANTO: Evaluating Synthesized Phrases to Enhance Robustness in AI Detection for Text Originationcited by 6
  5. 2023Efficient Black-Box Adversarial Attacks on Neural Text Detectorscited by 3
  6. 2023Robust Infidelity: When Faithfulness Measures on Masked Language Models Are Misleadingcited by 1
  7. 2025Feature Extraction and Analysis for GPT-Generated Textcited by 1
  8. 2025Personalized Author Obfuscation with Large Language Modelscited by 0
  9. 2025Stylometry recognizes human and LLM-generated texts in short samplescited by 0
  10. 2025StylOch at PAN: Gradient-Boosted Trees with Frequency-Based Stylometric Featurescited by 0
  11. 2025RL-Finetuned LLMs for Privacy-Preserving Synthetic Rewritingcited by 0
  12. 2026Authorship Impersonation via LLM Prompting does not Evade Authorship Verification Methodscited by 0
  13. 2026Hidden Human-Like Nature of Machine-Generated Texts: Theory and Detection Enhancementcited by 0