mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Detection of multiple retinal diseases in ultra-widefield fundus images using deep learning: data-driven identification of relevant regions

arXiv 2203.06113 ↗First posted 11 Mar 2022eess.IV cs.AI cs.CVcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Ultra-widefield (UWF) imaging is a promising modality that captures a larger retinal field of view compared to traditional fundus photography. Previous studies showed that deep learning (DL) models are effective for detecting retinal disease in UWF images, but primarily considered individual diseases under less-than-realistic conditions (excluding images with other diseases, artefacts, comorbidities, or borderline cases; and balancing healthy and diseased images) and did not systematically investigate which regions of the UWF images are relevant for disease detection. We first improve on the state of the field by proposing a DL model that can recognise multiple retinal diseases under more realistic conditions. We then use global explainability methods to identify which regions of the UWF images the model generally attends to. Our model performs very well, separating between healthy and diseased retinas with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.9206 on an internal test set, and an AUC of 0.9841 on a challenging, external test set. When diagnosing specific diseases, the model attends to regions where we would expect those diseases to occur. We further identify the posterior pole as the most important region in a purely data-driven fashion. Surprisingly, 10% of the image around the posterior pole is sufficient for achieving comparable performance to having the full images available.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Mar 2022.

Builds on

16 of 44 references.

References · 16

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  3. 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 6,979
  4. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
  5. 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,451
  6. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
  7. 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 4,993
  8. 2015Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classificationcited by 3,590
  9. 2017Random Erasing Data Augmentationcited by 1,235
  10. 2018Averaging Weights Leads to Wider Optima and Better Generalizationcited by 1,194
  11. 2019When Does Label Smoothing Help?cited by 985
  12. 2021ResNet strikes back: An improved training procedure in timmcited by 365
4 more
  1. 2021Revisiting ResNets: Improved Training and Scaling Strategiescited by 158
  2. 2017Predicting Cardiovascular Risk Factors from Retinal Fundus Photographs using Deep Learningcited by 63
  3. 2021Deep learning on fundus images detects glaucoma beyond the optic disccited by 9
  4. 2021Global explainability in aligned image modalitiescited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.