Global explainability in aligned image modalities
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep learning (DL) models are very effective on many computer vision problems and increasingly used in critical applications. They are also inherently black box. A number of methods exist to generate image-wise explanations that allow practitioners to understand and verify model predictions for a given image. Beyond that, it would be desirable to validate that a DL model textitgenerally works in a sensible way, i.e. consistent with domain knowledge and not relying on undesirable data artefacts. For this purpose, the model needs to be explained globally. In this work, we focus on image modalities that are naturally aligned such that each pixel position represents a similar relative position on the imaged object, as is common in medical imaging. We propose the pixel-wise aggregation of image-wise explanations as a simple method to obtain label-wise and overall global explanations. These can then be used for model validation, knowledge discovery, and as an efficient way to communicate qualitative conclusions drawn from inspecting image-wise explanations. We further propose Progressive Erasing Plus Progressive Restoration (PEPPR) as a method to quantitatively validate that these global explanations are faithful to how the model makes its predictions. We then apply these methods to ultra-widefield retinal images, a naturally aligned modality. We find that the global explanations are consistent with domain knowledge and faithfully reflect the model's workings.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Dec 2021.
Builds on
19 of 35 references.
References · 19
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
- 2020Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 1,928
- 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,454
- 2017Random Erasing Data Augmentationcited by 1,235
- 2018Sanity Checks for Saliency Mapscited by 1,149
- 2018A Survey Of Methods For Explaining Black Box Modelscited by 970
- 2017Revisiting Unreasonable Effectiveness of Data in Deep Learning Eracited by 916
- 2018Explaining Explanations: An Overview of Interpretability of Machine Learningcited by 508
7 more
- 2015Evaluating the visualization of what a Deep Neural Network has learnedcited by 416
- 2020Common pitfalls and recommendations for using machine learning to detect and prognosticate for COVID-19 using chest radiographs and CT scanscited by 158
- 2019"How do I fool you?": Manipulating User Trust via Misleading Black Box Explanationscited by 111
- 2019Explainable AI for Trees: From Local Explanations to Global Understandingcited by 64
- 2018Local Explanation Methods for Deep Neural Networks Lack Sensitivity to Parameter Valuescited by 40
- 2018Visual Analytics for Explainable Deep Learningcited by 39
- 2021Synthesize-It-Classifier: Learning a Generative Classifier through RecurrentSelf-analysiscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1.
1 paper.