mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Learning-based Localizability Estimation for Robust LiDAR Localization

arXiv 2203.05698 ↗First posted 11 Mar 2022cs.RO cs.AI cs.CVcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

LiDAR-based localization and mapping is one of the core components in many modern robotic systems due to the direct integration of range and geometry, allowing for precise motion estimation and generation of high quality maps in real-time. Yet, as a consequence of insufficient environmental constraints present in the scene, this dependence on geometry can result in localization failure, happening in self-symmetric surroundings such as tunnels. This work addresses precisely this issue by proposing a neural network-based estimation approach for detecting (non-)localizability during robot operation. Special attention is given to the localizability of scan-to-scan registration, as it is a crucial component in many LiDAR odometry estimation pipelines. In contrast to previous, mostly traditional detection approaches, the proposed method enables early detection of failure by estimating the localizability on raw sensor measurements without evaluating the underlying registration optimization. Moreover, previous approaches remain limited in their ability to generalize across environments and sensor types, as heuristic-tuning of degeneracy detection thresholds is required. The proposed approach avoids this problem by learning from a collection of different environments, allowing the network to function over various scenarios. Furthermore, the network is trained exclusively on simulated data, avoiding arduous data collection in challenging and degenerate, often hard-to-access, environments. The presented method is tested during field experiments conducted across challenging environments and on two different sensor types without any modifications. The observed detection performance is on par with state-of-the-art methods after environment-specific threshold tuning.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Mar 2022.

Builds on

14 of 36 references.

References · 14

  1. 2016PointNet: Deep Learning on Point Sets for 3D Classification and Segmentationcited by 5,223
  2. 20194D Spatio-Temporal ConvNets: Minkowski Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 1,201
  3. 2020Point-GNN: Graph Neural Network for 3D Object Detection in a Point Cloudcited by 335
  4. 2017Road Extraction by Deep Residual U-Netcited by 333
  5. 2019LO-Net: Deep Real-time Lidar Odometrycited by 59
  6. 2020Self-supervised Learning of LiDAR Odometry for Robotic Applicationscited by 15
  7. 2022CERBERUS: Autonomous Legged and Aerial Robotic Exploration in the Tunnel and Urban Circuits of the DARPA Subterranean Challengecited by 15
  8. 2018CELLO-3D: Estimating the Covariance of ICP in the Real Worldcited by 13
  9. 2022Graph-based Multi-sensor Fusion for Consistent Localization of Autonomous Construction Robotscited by 11
  10. 2019A New Approach to 3D ICP Covariance Estimationcited by 9
  11. 2021CorAl -- Are the point clouds Correctly Aligned?cited by 6
  12. 2014On the Covariance of ICP-based Scan-matching Techniquescited by 5
2 more
  1. 2020Estimating Motion Uncertainty with Bayesian ICPcited by 3
  2. 2020PointNetKL: Deep Inference for GICP Covariance Estimation in Bathymetric SLAMcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 6; 2026: 1.

11 papers.