mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Dense 3D Reconstruction Through Lidar: A Comparative Study on Ex-vivo Porcine Tissue

arXiv 2401.10709 ↗First posted 19 Jan 2024eess.IV cs.CV cs.ROcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

New sensing technologies and more advanced processing algorithms are transforming computer-integrated surgery. While researchers are actively investigating depth sensing and 3D reconstruction for vision-based surgical assistance, it remains difficult to achieve real-time, accurate, and robust 3D representations of the abdominal cavity for minimally invasive surgery. Thus, this work uses quantitative testing on fresh ex-vivo porcine tissue to thoroughly characterize the quality with which a 3D laser-based time-of-flight sensor (lidar) can perform anatomical surface reconstruction. Ground-truth surface shapes are captured with a commercial laser scanner, and the resulting signed error fields are analyzed using rigorous statistical tools. When compared to modern learning-based stereo matching from endoscopic images, time-of-flight sensing demonstrates higher precision, lower processing delay, higher frame rate, and superior robustness against sensor distance and poor illumination. Furthermore, we report on the potential negative effect of near-infrared light penetration on the accuracy of lidar measurements across different tissue samples, identifying a significant measured depth offset for muscle in contrast to fat and liver. Our findings highlight the potential of lidar for intraoperative 3D perception and point toward new methods that combine complementary time-of-flight and spectral imaging.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 61 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Jan 2024.

Builds on

17 of 61 references.

References · 17

  1. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  2. 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,694
  3. 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,764
  4. 2022Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5,603
  5. 2022Visual Language Maps for Robot Navigationcited by 362
  6. 2021RAFT-Stereo: Multilevel Recurrent Field Transforms for Stereo Matchingcited by 348
  7. 2020Revisiting Stereo Depth Estimation From a Sequence-to-Sequence Perspective with Transformerscited by 190
  8. 2021Stereo Correspondence and Reconstruction of Endoscopic Data Challengecited by 101
  9. 2020A Survey on Deep Learning Techniques for Stereo-based Depth Estimationcited by 90
  10. 2021Range Image-based LiDAR Localization for Autonomous Vehiclescited by 25
  11. 2021Self-Supervised Generative Adversarial Network for Depth Estimation in Laparoscopic Imagescited by 21
  12. 2022Semantic-SuPer: A Semantic-aware Surgical Perception Framework for Endoscopic Tissue Identification, Reconstruction, and Trackingcited by 19
5 more
  1. 2022X-ICP: Localizability-Aware LiDAR Registration for Robust Localization in Extreme Environmentscited by 19
  2. 2021An Aligned Rank Transform Procedure for Multifactor Contrast Testscited by 11
  3. 2022Graph-based Multi-sensor Fusion for Consistent Localization of Autonomous Construction Robotscited by 11
  4. 2022Learning-based Localizability Estimation for Robust LiDAR Localizationcited by 11
  5. 2023Regularising disparity estimation via multi task learning with structured light reconstructioncited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

2 papers.