mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Towards Inadequately Pre-trained Models in Transfer Learning

arXiv 2203.04668 ↗First posted 9 Mar 2022cs.CVcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Pre-training has been a popular learning paradigm in deep learning era, especially in annotation-insufficient scenario. Better ImageNet pre-trained models have been demonstrated, from the perspective of architecture, by previous research to have better transferability to downstream tasks. However, in this paper, we found that during the same pre-training process, models at middle epochs, which is inadequately pre-trained, can outperform fully trained models when used as feature extractors (FE), while the fine-tuning (FT) performance still grows with the source performance. This reveals that there is not a solid positive correlation between top-1 accuracy on ImageNet and the transferring result on target data. Based on the contradictory phenomenon between FE and FT that better feature extractor fails to be fine-tuned better accordingly, we conduct comprehensive analyses on features before softmax layer to provide insightful explanations. Our discoveries suggest that, during pre-training, models tend to first learn spectral components corresponding to large singular values and the residual components contribute more when fine-tuning.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 54 of its 88 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Mar 2022.

Builds on

54 of 88 references.

References · 54

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  4. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  5. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  6. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  7. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
  8. 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,662
  9. 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,482
  10. 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,712
  11. 2022BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and Generationcited by 4,310
  12. 2020Exploring Simple Siamese Representation Learningcited by 2,853
38 more
  1. 2020Unsupervised Learning of Visual Features by Contrasting Cluster Assignmentscited by 2,845
  2. 2019XLNet: Generalized Autoregressive Pretraining for Language Understandingcited by 2,801
  3. 2020Improved Baselines with Momentum Contrastive Learningcited by 2,282
  4. 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,278
  5. 2019ViLBERT: Pretraining Task-Agnostic Visiolinguistic Representations for Vision-and-Language Taskscited by 2,219
  6. 2013Describing Textures in the Wildcited by 2,110
  7. 2021Barlow Twins: Self-Supervised Learning via Redundancy Reductioncited by 1,818
  8. 2013Fine-Grained Visual Classification of Aircraftcited by 1,701
  9. 2018Unsupervised Representation Learning by Predicting Image Rotationscited by 1,586
  10. 2016Unsupervised Learning of Visual Representations by Solving Jigsaw Puzzlescited by 1,379
  11. 2017Bottom-Up and Top-Down Attention for Image Captioning and Visual Question Answeringcited by 1,310
  12. 2019Contrastive Multiview Codingcited by 1,297
  13. 2014How transferable are features in deep neural networks?cited by 1,216
  14. 2021Tokens-to-Token ViT: Training Vision Transformers from Scratch on ImageNetcited by 1,096
  15. 2017A Closer Look at Memorization in Deep Networkscited by 936
  16. 2019Self-supervised Visual Feature Learning with Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 656
  17. 2018Do Better ImageNet Models Transfer Better?cited by 560
  18. 2018Rethinking ImageNet Pre-trainingcited by 376
  19. 2019Using Pre-Training Can Improve Model Robustness and Uncertaintycited by 373
  20. 2019Transfusion: Understanding Transfer Learning for Medical Imagingcited by 366
  21. 2019Frequency Principle: Fourier Analysis Sheds Light on Deep Neural Networkscited by 360
  22. 2020Rethinking Pre-training and Self-trainingcited by 352
  23. 2020Do Adversarially Robust ImageNet Models Transfer Better?cited by 315
  24. 2020Revisiting Few-sample BERT Fine-tuningcited by 237
  25. 2018Explicit Inductive Bias for Transfer Learning with Convolutional Networkscited by 226
  26. 2018Characterizing and Avoiding Negative Transfercited by 226
  27. 2021DetCo: Unsupervised Contrastive Learning for Object Detectioncited by 205
  28. 2019SGD on Neural Networks Learns Functions of Increasing Complexitycited by 203
  29. 2016What makes ImageNet good for transfer learning?cited by 192
  30. 2020LEEP: A New Measure to Evaluate Transferability of Learned Representationscited by 182
  31. 2018Training behavior of deep neural network in frequency domaincited by 174
  32. 2021LogME: Practical Assessment of Pre-trained Models for Transfer Learningcited by 168
  33. 2019Towards Explaining the Regularization Effect of Initial Large Learning Rate in Training Neural Networkscited by 162
  34. 2019Transferability and Hardness of Supervised Classification Taskscited by 125
  35. 2021Aligning Pretraining for Detection via Object-Level Contrastive Learningcited by 110
  36. 2021Instance Localization for Self-supervised Detection Pretrainingcited by 99
  37. 2019Polysemous Visual-Semantic Embedding for Cross-Modal Retrievalcited by 83
  38. 2019DELTA: DEep Learning Transfer using Feature Map with Attention for Convolutional Networkscited by 80

50 most cited of 54 All 54 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 4; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

5 papers.