Fairness for Text Classification Tasks with Identity Information Data Augmentation Methods
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Counterfactual fairness methods address the question: How would the prediction change if the sensitive identity attributes referenced in the text instance were different? These methods are entirely based on generating counterfactuals for the given training and test set instances. Counterfactual instances are commonly prepared by replacing sensitive identity terms, i.e., the identity terms present in the instance are replaced with other identity terms that fall under the same sensitive category. Therefore, the efficacy of these methods depends heavily on the quality and comprehensiveness of identity pairs. In this paper, we offer a two-step data augmentation process where (1) the former stage consists of a novel method for preparing a comprehensive list of identity pairs with word embeddings, and (2) the latter consists of leveraging prepared identity pairs list to enhance the training instances by applying three simple operations (namely identity pair replacement, identity term blindness, and identity pair swap). We empirically show that the two-stage augmentation process leads to diverse identity pairs and an enhanced training set, with an improved counterfactual token-based fairness metric score on two well-known text classification tasks.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 15 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Feb 2022.
Builds on
12 of 15 references.
References · 12
- 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,346
- 2016Enriching Word Vectors with Subword Informationcited by 1,578
- 2016Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddingscited by 1,304
- 2014Convolutional Neural Networks for Sentence Classificationcited by 1,124
- 2019EDA: Easy Data Augmentation Techniques for Boosting Performance on Text Classification Taskscited by 800
- 2019Nuanced Metrics for Measuring Unintended Bias with Real Data for Text Classificationcited by 396
- 2018Adversarial Logit Pairingcited by 224
- 2018Hate Speech Dataset from a White Supremacy Forumcited by 196
- 2018Counterfactual Fairness in Text Classification through Robustnesscited by 150
- 2019Perturbation Sensitivity Analysis to Detect Unintended Model Biasescited by 74
- 2017Racial Disparity in Natural Language Processing: A Case Study of Social Media African-American Englishcited by 69
- 2019Reducing Gender Bias in Word-Level Language Models with a Gender-Equalizing Loss Functioncited by 57
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 3.
4 papers.
- 2024Addressing Both Statistical and Causal Gender Fairness in NLP Modelscited by 4
- 2024Who's the (Multi-)Fairest of Them All: Rethinking Interpolation-Based Data Augmentation Through the Lens of Multicalibrationcited by 1
- 2023TIDE: Textual Identity Detection for Evaluating and Augmenting Classification and Language Modelscited by 0
- 2024Evaluation Metrics for Text Data Augmentation in NLPcited by 0
- 2024Who's the (Multi-)Fairest of Them All: Rethinking Interpolation-Based Data Augmentation Through the Lens of Multicalibration13 Dec 2024
- 2024Addressing Both Statistical and Causal Gender Fairness in NLP Models30 Mar 2024
- 2024Evaluation Metrics for Text Data Augmentation in NLP9 Feb 2024
- 2023TIDE: Textual Identity Detection for Evaluating and Augmenting Classification and Language Models7 Sep 2023