mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

TIDE: Textual Identity Detection for Evaluating and Augmenting Classification and Language Models

arXiv 2309.04027 ↗First posted 7 Sep 2023cs.CL cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine learning models can perpetuate unintended biases from unfair and imbalanced datasets. Evaluating and debiasing these datasets and models is especially hard in text datasets where sensitive attributes such as race, gender, and sexual orientation may not be available. When these models are deployed into society, they can lead to unfair outcomes for historically underrepresented groups. In this paper, we present a dataset coupled with an approach to improve text fairness in classifiers and language models. We create a new, more comprehensive identity lexicon, TIDAL, which includes 15,123 identity terms and associated sense context across three demographic categories. We leverage TIDAL to develop an identity annotation and augmentation tool that can be used to improve the availability of identity context and the effectiveness of ML fairness techniques. We evaluate our approaches using human contributors, and additionally run experiments focused on dataset and model debiasing. Results show our assistive annotation technique improves the reliability and velocity of human-in-the-loop processes. Our dataset and methods uncover more disparities during evaluation, and also produce more fair models during remediation. These approaches provide a practical path forward for scaling classifier and generative model fairness in real-world settings.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Sep 2023.

Builds on

22 of 56 references.

References · 22

  1. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  2. 2020Language (Technology) is Power: A Critical Survey of "Bias" in NLPcited by 951
  3. 2020Recipes for building an open-domain chatbotcited by 593
  4. 2019Nuanced Metrics for Measuring Unintended Bias with Real Data for Text Classificationcited by 396
  5. 2021Persistent Anti-Muslim Bias in Large Language Modelscited by 376
  6. 2018AI Fairness 360: An Extensible Toolkit for Detecting, Understanding, and Mitigating Unwanted Algorithmic Biascited by 319
  7. 2020Fairness without Demographics through Adversarially Reweighted Learningcited by 251
  8. 2016Ex Machina: Personal Attacks Seen at Scalecited by 208
  9. 2022"I'm sorry to hear that": Finding New Biases in Language Models with a Holistic Descriptor Datasetcited by 160
  10. 2018Counterfactual Fairness in Text Classification through Robustnesscited by 150
  11. 2020Intrinsic Bias Metrics Do Not Correlate with Application Biascited by 148
  12. 2018Aequitas: A Bias and Fairness Audit Toolkitcited by 145
10 more
  1. 2019Predictive Biases in Natural Language Processing Models: A Conceptual Framework and Overviewcited by 137
  2. 2017Measuring the Reliability of Hate Speech Annotations: The Case of the European Refugee Crisiscited by 95
  3. 2013Discrimination in Online Ad Deliverycited by 93
  4. 2020"What We Can't Measure, We Can't Understand": Challenges to Demographic Data Procurement in the Pursuit of Fairnesscited by 56
  5. 2021Learning Fair Classifiers with Partially Annotated Group Labelscited by 40
  6. 2018Proxy Fairnesscited by 29
  7. 2022Demographic-Reliant Algorithmic Fairness: Characterizing the Risks of Demographic Data Collection in the Pursuit of Fairnesscited by 13
  8. 2020Are "Undocumented Workers" the Same as "Illegal Aliens"? Disentangling Denotation and Connotation in Vector Spacescited by 10
  9. 2020A Unified Feature Representation for Lexical Connotationscited by 6
  10. 2022Fairness for Text Classification Tasks with Identity Information Data Augmentation Methodscited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.