mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Sparsity-Inducing Categorical Prior Improves Robustness of the Information Bottleneck

arXiv 2203.02592 ↗First posted 4 Mar 2022stat.ML cs.LG stat.MEcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The information bottleneck framework provides a systematic approach to learning representations that compress nuisance information in the input and extract semantically meaningful information about predictions. However, the choice of a prior distribution that fixes the dimensionality across all the data can restrict the flexibility of this approach for learning robust representations. We present a novel sparsity-inducing spike-slab categorical prior that uses sparsity as a mechanism to provide the flexibility that allows each data point to learn its own dimension distribution. In addition, it provides a mechanism for learning a joint distribution of the latent variable and the sparsity and hence can account for the complete uncertainty in the latent space. Through a series of experiments using in-distribution and out-of-distribution learning scenarios on the MNIST, CIFAR-10, and ImageNet data, we show that the proposed approach improves accuracy and robustness compared to traditional fixed-dimensional priors, as well as other sparsity induction mechanisms for latent variable models proposed in the literature.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Mar 2022.

Builds on

26 of 40 references.

References · 26

  1. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  2. 2017Neural Discrete Representation Learningcited by 4,650
  3. 2013Auto-Encoding Variational Bayescited by 3,980
  4. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
  5. 2016Categorical Reparameterization with Gumbel-Softmaxcited by 2,708
  6. 2016Inception-v4, Inception-ResNet and the Impact of Residual Connections on Learningcited by 1,509
  7. 2019Can You Trust Your Model's Uncertainty? Evaluating Predictive Uncertainty Under Dataset Shiftcited by 1,274
  8. 2016The Concrete Distribution: A Continuous Relaxation of Discrete Random Variablescited by 1,135
  9. 2016Deep Variational Information Bottleneckcited by 915
  10. 2017Ensemble Adversarial Training: Attacks and Defensescited by 833
  11. 2015Deep Learning and the Information Bottleneck Principlecited by 793
  12. 2020On Adaptive Attacks to Adversarial Example Defensescited by 547
14 more
  1. 2020Captum: A unified and generic model interpretability library for PyTorchcited by 542
  2. 2021Invariance Principle Meets Information Bottleneck for Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 220
  3. 2019MNIST-C: A Robustness Benchmark for Computer Visioncited by 137
  4. 2020The Conditional Entropy Bottleneckcited by 75
  5. 2018How Important Is a Neuron?cited by 73
  6. 2017Nonlinear Information Bottleneckcited by 71
  7. 2021Deep Deterministic Information Bottleneck with Matrix-based Entropy Functionalcited by 18
  8. 2019The Convex Information Bottleneck Lagrangiancited by 16
  9. 2014Tag-Aware Ordinal Sparse Factor Analysis for Learning and Content Analyticscited by 15
  10. 2021Drop-Bottleneck: Learning Discrete Compressed Representation for Noise-Robust Explorationcited by 15
  11. 2017Tackling Over-pruning in Variational Autoencoderscited by 14
  12. 2020CEB Improves Model Robustnesscited by 14
  13. 2021On Incorporating Inductive Biases into VAEscited by 11
  14. 2021Adversarial Information Bottleneckcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.

1 paper.