mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Deep Lexical Hypothesis: Identifying personality structure in natural language

arXiv 2203.02092 ↗First posted 4 Mar 2022cs.CLcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent advances in natural language processing (NLP) have produced general models that can perform complex tasks such as summarizing long passages and translating across languages. Here, we introduce a method to extract adjective similarities from language models as done with survey-based ratings in traditional psycholexical studies but using millions of times more text in a natural setting. The correlational structure produced through this method is highly similar to that of self- and other-ratings of 435 terms reported by Saucier and Goldberg (1996a). The first three unrotated factors produced using NLP are congruent with those in survey data, with coefficients of 0.89, 0.79, and 0.79. This structure is robust to many modeling decisions: adjective set, including those with 1,710 terms (Goldberg, 1982) and 18,000 terms (Allport & Odbert, 1936); the query used to extract correlations; and language model. Notably, Neuroticism and Openness are only weakly and inconsistently recovered. This is a new source of signal that is closer to the original (semantic) vision of the Lexical Hypothesis. The method can be applied where surveys cannot: in dozens of languages simultaneously, with tens of thousands of items, on historical text, and at extremely large scale for little cost. The code is made public to facilitate reproduction and fast iteration in new directions of research.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 138 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Mar 2022.

Builds on

19 of 138 references.

References · 19

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  3. 2013Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionalitycited by 3,474
  4. 2017A Broad-Coverage Challenge Corpus for Sentence Understanding through Inferencecited by 2,682
  5. 2020The Pile: An 800GB Dataset of Diverse Text for Language Modelingcited by 2,411
  6. 2019HuggingFace's Transformers: State-of-the-art Natural Language Processingcited by 2,218
  7. 2020DeBERTa: Decoding-enhanced BERT with Disentangled Attentioncited by 2,181
  8. 2021Scaling Language Models: Methods, Analysis & Insights from Training Gophercited by 1,202
  9. 2015Aligning Books and Movies: Towards Story-like Visual Explanations by Watching Movies and Reading Bookscited by 1,043
  10. 2020StereoSet: Measuring stereotypical bias in pretrained language modelscited by 924
  11. 2021Deduplicating Training Data Makes Language Models Bettercited by 714
  12. 2021Efficient Large-Scale Language Model Training on GPU Clusters Using Megatron-LMcited by 632
7 more
  1. 2021ClipCap: CLIP Prefix for Image Captioningcited by 559
  2. 2021Pre-Trained Models: Past, Present and Futurecited by 319
  3. 2020How Good is Your Tokenizer? On the Monolingual Performance of Multilingual Language Modelscited by 318
  4. 2018A Simple Method for Commonsense Reasoningcited by 223
  5. 2019Identifying and Reducing Gender Bias in Word-Level Language Modelscited by 214
  6. 2020Machine Reading Comprehension: The Role of Contextualized Language Models and Beyondcited by 21
  7. 2018Varimax rotation based on gradient projection needs between 10 and more than 500 random start loading matrices for optimal performancecited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 3; 2025: 4; 2026: 2.

10 papers.