mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Neural network embeddings recover value dimensions from psychometric survey items on par with human data

arXiv 2509.24906 ↗First posted 29 Sep 2025cs.AI cs.CLcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We demonstrate that embeddings derived from large language models, when processed with "Survey and Questionnaire Item Embeddings Differentials" (SQuID), can recover the structure of human values obtained from human rater judgments on the Revised Portrait Value Questionnaire (PVQ-RR). We compare multiple embedding models across a number of evaluation metrics including internal consistency, dimension correlations and multidimensional scaling configurations. Unlike previous approaches, SQuID addresses the challenge of obtaining negative correlations between dimensions without requiring domain-specific fine-tuning or training data re-annotation. Quantitative analysis reveals that our embedding-based approach explains 55% of variance in dimension-dimension similarities compared to human data. Multidimensional scaling configurations show alignment with pooled human data from 49 different countries. Generalizability tests across three personality inventories (IPIP, BFI-2, HEXACO) demonstrate that SQuID consistently increases correlation ranges, suggesting applicability beyond value theory. These results show that semantic embeddings can effectively replicate psychometric structures previously established through extensive human surveys. The approach offers substantial advantages in cost, scalability and flexibility while maintaining comparable quality to traditional methods. Our findings have significant implications for psychometrics and social science research, providing a complementary methodology that could expand the scope of human behavior and experience represented in measurement tools.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Sep 2025.

Builds on

11 of 56 references.

References · 11

  1. 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,346
  2. 2017A Broad-Coverage Challenge Corpus for Sentence Understanding through Inferencecited by 2,665
  3. 2022Out of One, Many: Using Language Models to Simulate Human Samplescited by 737
  4. 2022Using Large Language Models to Simulate Multiple Humans and Replicate Human Subject Studiescited by 506
  5. 2022Using cognitive psychology to understand GPT-3cited by 389
  6. 2024jina-embeddings-v3: Multilingual Embeddings With Task LoRAcited by 138
  7. 2025KaLM-Embedding: Superior Training Data Brings A Stronger Embedding Modelcited by 36
  8. 2019No Training Required: Exploring Random Encoders for Sentence Classificationcited by 30
  9. 2020Quantifying social organization and political polarization in online platformscited by 30
  10. 2023What does ChatGPT return about human values? Exploring value bias in ChatGPT using a descriptive value theorycited by 19
  11. 2022Deep Lexical Hypothesis: Identifying personality structure in natural languagecited by 10

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.