Implicit Personality Representations in Humans and LLMs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
A century of psychology has found that the trait words people use to describe one another vary, but the relational structure among those traits, which ones go together and which oppose, is strikingly consistent across raters and cultures. We test whether the LLM (Qwen 2.5-7B-Instruct) reproduces this structure in its internal trait representations. From millions of crowd-sourced personality ratings of fictional characters, we build a human implicit-personality matrix over hundreds of traits; from contrastive model activations, we build a matching matrix over the same traits. The two relational structures align strongly (Mantel r = 0.77), and the agreement holds trait by trait as well as in aggregate. Two dominant axes of the model's trait representations recover the social and intellectual dimensions long known to organize human personality impressions, social warmth and intellectual competence. On held-out dialogue, projecting model activations onto these directions yields personality profiles that agree with human ratings. This work establishes a framework that enables comprehensive, human-grounded comparison between internal model trait geometry and the shared structure of human personality impressions.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Sep 2026.
Builds on
16 of 41 references.
References · 16
- 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,420
- 2023Inference-Time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language Modelcited by 1,302
- 2023Towards Understanding Sycophancy in Language Modelscited by 1,040
- 2024Refusal in Language Models Is Mediated by a Single Directioncited by 1,032
- 2023Whose Opinions Do Language Models Reflect?cited by 773
- 2023The Geometry of Truth: Emergent Linear Structure in Large Language Model Representations of True/False Datasetscited by 712
- 2023Evaluating the Moral Beliefs Encoded in LLMscited by 215
- 2024Improving Instruction-Following in Language Models through Activation Steeringcited by 160
- 2023In-Context Impersonation Reveals Large Language Models' Strengths and Biasescited by 155
- 2022Human alignment of neural network representationscited by 74
- 2024Do LLMs Have Distinct and Consistent Personality? TRAIT: Personality Testset designed for LLMs with Psychometricscited by 59
- 2024Who's asking? User personas and the mechanics of latent misalignmentcited by 40
4 more
- 2024PICLe: Eliciting Diverse Behaviors from Large Language Models with Persona In-Context Learningcited by 29
- 2022Deep Lexical Hypothesis: Identifying personality structure in natural languagecited by 10
- 2024Rediscovering the Latent Dimensions of Personality with Large Language Models as Trait Descriptorscited by 6
- 2026Measuring Pragmatic Influence in Large Language Model Instructionscited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.