mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning with AI Planning Models

arXiv 2203.00669 ↗First posted 1 Mar 2022cs.AIcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Two common approaches to sequential decision-making are AI planning (AIP) and reinforcement learning (RL). Each has strengths and weaknesses. AIP is interpretable, easy to integrate with symbolic knowledge, and often efficient, but requires an up-front logical domain specification and is sensitive to noise; RL only requires specification of rewards and is robust to noise but is sample inefficient and not easily supplied with external knowledge. We propose an integrative approach that combines high-level planning with RL, retaining interpretability, transfer, and efficiency, while allowing for robust learning of the lower-level plan actions. Our approach defines options in hierarchical reinforcement learning (HRL) from AIP operators by establishing a correspondence between the state transition model of AI planning problem and the abstract state transition system of a Markov Decision Process (MDP). Options are learned by adding intrinsic rewards to encourage consistency between the MDP and AIP transition models. We demonstrate the benefit of our integrated approach by comparing the performance of RL and HRL algorithms in both MiniGrid and N-rooms environments, showing the advantage of our method over the existing ones.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 75 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Mar 2022.

Builds on

24 of 75 references.

References · 24

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  2. 2015Deep Reinforcement Learning with Double Q-learningcited by 1,704
  3. 2017Curiosity-driven Exploration by Self-supervised Predictioncited by 1,173
  4. 2019Meta-World: A Benchmark and Evaluation for Multi-Task and Meta Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,168
  5. 2016The Option-Critic Architecturecited by 433
  6. 2019Neural Probabilistic Logic Programming in DeepProbLogcited by 389
  7. 2017FeUdal Networks for Hierarchical Reinforcement Learningcited by 328
  8. 2016Hierarchical Deep Reinforcement Learning: Integrating Temporal Abstraction and Intrinsic Motivationcited by 282
  9. 2020Integrated Task and Motion Planningcited by 281
  10. 2020Inductive Biases for Deep Learning of Higher-Level Cognitioncited by 273
  11. 2020Reward Machines: Exploiting Reward Function Structure in Reinforcement Learningcited by 183
  12. 2021Multi-Task Reinforcement Learning with Context-based Representationscited by 169
12 more
  1. 2017A Laplacian Framework for Option Discovery in Reinforcement Learningcited by 108
  2. 2018Hierarchical Imitation and Reinforcement Learningcited by 88
  3. 2018SDRL: Interpretable and Data-efficient Deep Reinforcement Learning Leveraging Symbolic Planningcited by 77
  4. 2018PEORL: Integrating Symbolic Planning and Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning for Robust Decision-Makingcited by 51
  5. 2019Learning Domain-Independent Planning Heuristics with Hypergraph Networkscited by 50
  6. 2017Learning Generalized Reactive Policies using Deep Neural Networkscited by 39
  7. 2017Action Schema Networks: Generalised Policies with Deep Learningcited by 32
  8. 2021The Logical Options Frameworkcited by 24
  9. 2021Reinforcement Learning for Classical Planning: Viewing Heuristics as Dense Reward Generatorscited by 21
  10. 2021On the (In)Tractability of Reinforcement Learning for LTL Objectivescited by 18
  11. 2021Context-Specific Representation Abstraction for Deep Option Learningcited by 8
  12. 2019From semantics to execution: Integrating action planning with reinforcement learning for robotic causal problem-solvingcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

2 papers.