Bayesian autoencoders with uncertainty quantification: Towards trustworthy anomaly detection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Despite numerous studies of deep autoencoders (AEs) for unsupervised anomaly detection, AEs still lack a way to express uncertainty in their predictions, crucial for ensuring safe and trustworthy machine learning systems in high-stake applications. Therefore, in this work, the formulation of Bayesian autoencoders (BAEs) is adopted to quantify the total anomaly uncertainty, comprising epistemic and aleatoric uncertainties. To evaluate the quality of uncertainty, we consider the task of classifying anomalies with the additional option of rejecting predictions of high uncertainty. In addition, we use the accuracy-rejection curve and propose the weighted average accuracy as a performance metric. Our experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of the BAE and total anomaly uncertainty on a set of benchmark datasets and two real datasets for manufacturing: one for condition monitoring, the other for quality inspection.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 61 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Feb 2022.
Builds on
20 of 61 references.
References · 20
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
- 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,335
- 2015Cyclical Learning Rates for Training Neural Networkscited by 627
- 2019Deep Learning for Anomaly Detection: A Surveycited by 357
- 2014Stochastic Gradient Hamiltonian Monte Carlocited by 341
- 2020Deep Learning for Anomaly Detection: A Reviewcited by 159
- 2019Edge AI: On-Demand Accelerating Deep Neural Network Inference via Edge Computingcited by 150
- 2020Uncertainty as a Form of Transparency: Measuring, Communicating, and Using Uncertaintycited by 128
- 2020Deep Learning for Medical Anomaly Detection -- A Surveycited by 127
- 2021Machine Learning with a Reject Option: A surveycited by 107
8 more
- 2018Uncertainty in Neural Networks: Approximately Bayesian Ensemblingcited by 94
- 2019Quality of Uncertainty Quantification for Bayesian Neural Network Inferencecited by 58
- 2019Bayesian Variational Autoencoders for Unsupervised Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 35
- 2021Revisiting Bayesian Autoencoders with MCMCcited by 10
- 2021Model Selection for Bayesian Autoencoderscited by 10
- 2021Bayesian Autoencoders for Drift Detection in Industrial Environmentscited by 6
- 2018Instance Selection Improves Geometric Mean Accuracy: A Study on Imbalanced Data Classificationcited by 5
- 2021Bayesian Autoencoders: Analysing and Fixing the Bernoulli likelihood for Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 1.
4 papers.
- 2024Explainability through uncertainty: Trustworthy decision-making with neural networkscited by 12
- 2025Graph Evidential Learning for Anomaly Detectioncited by 5
- 2024Leveraging Unsupervised Learning for Cost-Effective Visual Anomaly Detectioncited by 1
- 2023MSS-PAE: Saving Autoencoder-based Outlier Detection from Unexpected Reconstructioncited by 0
- 2025Graph Evidential Learning for Anomaly Detection31 May 2025
- 2024Leveraging Unsupervised Learning for Cost-Effective Visual Anomaly Detection24 Sep 2024
- 2024Explainability through uncertainty: Trustworthy decision-making with neural networks15 Mar 2024
- 2023MSS-PAE: Saving Autoencoder-based Outlier Detection from Unexpected Reconstruction3 Apr 2023