mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Seeing the advantage: visually grounding word embeddings to better capture human semantic knowledge

arXiv 2202.10292 ↗First posted 21 Feb 2022cs.CL cs.CV cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Distributional semantic models capture word-level meaning that is useful in many natural language processing tasks and have even been shown to capture cognitive aspects of word meaning. The majority of these models are purely text based, even though the human sensory experience is much richer. In this paper we create visually grounded word embeddings by combining English text and images and compare them to popular text-based methods, to see if visual information allows our model to better capture cognitive aspects of word meaning. Our analysis shows that visually grounded embedding similarities are more predictive of the human reaction times in a large priming experiment than the purely text-based embeddings. The visually grounded embeddings also correlate well with human word similarity ratings. Importantly, in both experiments we show that the grounded embeddings account for a unique portion of explained variance, even when we include text-based embeddings trained on huge corpora. This shows that visual grounding allows our model to capture information that cannot be extracted using text as the only source of information.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Feb 2022.

Builds on

17 of 41 references.

References · 17

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,375
  3. 2013Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionalitycited by 3,474
  4. 2016Enriching Word Vectors with Subword Informationcited by 1,583
  5. 2015Microsoft COCO Captions: Data Collection and Evaluation Servercited by 1,462
  6. 2014Deep Visual-Semantic Alignments for Generating Image Descriptionscited by 968
  7. 2015Cyclical Learning Rates for Training Neural Networkscited by 629
  8. 2017Advances in Pre-Training Distributed Word Representationscited by 207
  9. 2014SimLex-999: Evaluating Semantic Models with (Genuine) Similarity Estimationcited by 172
  10. 2017Representations of language in a model of visually grounded speech signalcited by 37
  11. 2017Learning Visually Grounded Sentence Representationscited by 24
  12. 2017Visually grounded learning of keyword prediction from untranscribed speechcited by 16
5 more
  1. 2016An Ensemble Method to Produce High-Quality Word Embeddings (2016)cited by 13
  2. 2017Experiential, Distributional and Dependency-based Word Embeddings have Complementary Roles in Decoding Brain Activitycited by 8
  3. 2018Using Sparse Semantic Embeddings Learned from Multimodal Text and Image Data to Model Human Conceptual Knowledgecited by 5
  4. 2021Semantic sentence similarity: size does not always mattercited by 5
  5. 2019Learning semantic sentence representations from visually grounded language without lexical knowledgecited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.

2 papers.