Semantic sentence similarity: size does not always matter
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This study addresses the question whether visually grounded speech recognition (VGS) models learn to capture sentence semantics without access to any prior linguistic knowledge. We produce synthetic and natural spoken versions of a well known semantic textual similarity database and show that our VGS model produces embeddings that correlate well with human semantic similarity judgements. Our results show that a model trained on a small image-caption database outperforms two models trained on much larger databases, indicating that database size is not all that matters. We also investigate the importance of having multiple captions per image and find that this is indeed helpful even if the total number of images is lower, suggesting that paraphrasing is a valuable learning signal. While the general trend in the field is to create ever larger datasets to train models on, our findings indicate other characteristics of the database can just as important important.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Jun 2021.
Builds on
19 of 26 references.
References · 19
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2015Microsoft COCO Captions: Data Collection and Evaluation Servercited by 1,447
- 2014Deep Visual-Semantic Alignments for Generating Image Descriptionscited by 966
- 2017Supervised Learning of Universal Sentence Representations from Natural Language Inference Datacited by 428
- 2015Skip-Thought Vectorscited by 321
- 2018SentEval: An Evaluation Toolkit for Universal Sentence Representationscited by 294
- 2016Learning Distributed Representations of Sentences from Unlabelled Datacited by 90
- 2018Jointly Discovering Visual Objects and Spoken Words from Raw Sensory Inputcited by 81
- 2015Deep Multimodal Semantic Embeddings for Speech and Imagescited by 56
- 2020Text-Free Image-to-Speech Synthesis Using Learned Segmental Unitscited by 50
7 more
- 2019Learning Hierarchical Discrete Linguistic Units from Visually-Grounded Speechcited by 44
- 2018Learning Semantic Textual Similarity from Conversationscited by 41
- 2017Learning Visually Grounded Sentence Representationscited by 24
- 2019Language learning using Speech to Image retrievalcited by 21
- 2018Visually grounded cross-lingual keyword spotting in speechcited by 19
- 2019Word Recognition, Competition, and Activation in a Model of Visually Grounded Speechcited by 13
- 2019Learning semantic sentence representations from visually grounded language without lexical knowledgecited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 1; 2024: 1.
5 papers.
- 2023What Do Self-Supervised Speech Models Know About Words?cited by 62
- 2022Seeing the advantage: visually grounding word embeddings to better capture human semantic knowledgecited by 2
- 2022Bootstrapping meaning through listening: Unsupervised learning of spoken sentence embeddingscited by 2
- 2022Modelling word learning and recognition using visually grounded speechcited by 0
- 2024An Empirical Analysis of Speech Self-Supervised Learning at Multiple Resolutionscited by 0
- 2024An Empirical Analysis of Speech Self-Supervised Learning at Multiple Resolutions31 Oct 2024
- 2023What Do Self-Supervised Speech Models Know About Words?30 Jun 2023
- 2022Bootstrapping meaning through listening: Unsupervised learning of spoken sentence embeddings23 Oct 2022
- 2022Modelling word learning and recognition using visually grounded speech14 Mar 2022
- 2022Seeing the advantage: visually grounding word embeddings to better capture human semantic knowledge21 Feb 2022