mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Transferring Adversarial Robustness Through Robust Representation Matching

arXiv 2202.09994 ↗First posted 21 Feb 2022cs.LG cs.CR cs.CVcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

With the widespread use of machine learning, concerns over its security and reliability have become prevalent. As such, many have developed defenses to harden neural networks against adversarial examples, imperceptibly perturbed inputs that are reliably misclassified. Adversarial training in which adversarial examples are generated and used during training is one of the few known defenses able to reliably withstand such attacks against neural networks. However, adversarial training imposes a significant training overhead and scales poorly with model complexity and input dimension. In this paper, we propose Robust Representation Matching (RRM), a low-cost method to transfer the robustness of an adversarially trained model to a new model being trained for the same task irrespective of architectural differences. Inspired by student-teacher learning, our method introduces a novel training loss that encourages the student to learn the teacher's robust representations. Compared to prior works, RRM is superior with respect to both model performance and adversarial training time. On CIFAR-10, RRM trains a robust model ~ 1.8× faster than the state-of-the-art. Furthermore, RRM remains effective on higher-dimensional datasets. On Restricted-ImageNet, RRM trains a ResNet50 model ~ 18× faster than standard adversarial training.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Feb 2022.

Builds on

23 of 28 references.

References · 23

  1. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  2. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,324
  3. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
  4. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
  5. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
  6. 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,998
  7. 2020Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attackscited by 1,451
  8. 2019Certified Adversarial Robustness via Randomized Smoothingcited by 1,340
  9. 2018Obfuscated Gradients Give a False Sense of Security: Circumventing Defenses to Adversarial Examplescited by 1,268
  10. 2019Adversarial Examples Are Not Bugs, They Are Featurescited by 953
  11. 2018Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracycited by 880
  12. 2017Ensemble Adversarial Training: Attacks and Defensescited by 840
11 more
  1. 2015The Limitations of Deep Learning in Adversarial Settingscited by 790
  2. 2020Fast is better than free: Revisiting adversarial trainingcited by 727
  3. 2015Distillation as a Defense to Adversarial Perturbations against Deep Neural Networkscited by 678
  4. 2019Adversarial Training for Free!cited by 643
  5. 2017Provable defenses against adversarial examples via the convex outer adversarial polytopecited by 567
  6. 2018Adversarial Attacks and Defences: A Surveycited by 259
  7. 2018Deep Learning: A Critical Appraisalcited by 217
  8. 2019Towards Stable and Efficient Training of Verifiably Robust Neural Networkscited by 205
  9. 2019Adversarially Robust Distillationcited by 125
  10. 2016Defensive Distillation is Not Robust to Adversarial Examplescited by 60
  11. 2019What it Thinks is Important is Important: Robustness Transfers through Input Gradientscited by 34

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 3.

7 papers.