mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Online Control of Unknown Time-Varying Dynamical Systems

arXiv 2202.07890 ↗First posted 16 Feb 2022cs.LG math.OC stat.MLcited by 13

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We study online control of time-varying linear systems with unknown dynamics in the nonstochastic control model. At a high level, we demonstrate that this setting is qualitatively harder than that of either unknown time-invariant or known time-varying dynamics, and complement our negative results with algorithmic upper bounds in regimes where sublinear regret is possible. More specifically, we study regret bounds with respect to common classes of policies: Disturbance Action (SLS), Disturbance Response (Youla), and linear feedback policies. While these three classes are essentially equivalent for LTI systems, we demonstrate that these equivalences break down for time-varying systems. We prove a lower bound that no algorithm can obtain sublinear regret with respect to the first two classes unless a certain measure of system variability also scales sublinearly in the horizon. Furthermore, we show that offline planning over the state linear feedback policies is NP-hard, suggesting hardness of the online learning problem. On the positive side, we give an efficient algorithm that attains a sublinear regret bound against the class of Disturbance Response policies up to the aforementioned system variability term. In fact, our algorithm enjoys sublinear adaptive regret bounds, which is a strictly stronger metric than standard regret and is more appropriate for time-varying systems. We sketch extensions to Disturbance Action policies and partial observation, and propose an inefficient algorithm for regret against linear state feedback policies.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Feb 2022.

Builds on

25 of 47 references.

References · 25

  1. 2021Convex optimizationcited by 2,515
  2. 2019Introduction to Online Convex Optimizationcited by 803
  3. 2018Global Convergence of Policy Gradient Methods for the Linear Quadratic Regulatorcited by 250
  4. 2020Naive Exploration is Optimal for Online LQRcited by 116
  5. 2015Strongly Adaptive Online Learningcited by 107
  6. 2019Online Control with Adversarial Disturbancescited by 92
  7. 2020Information Theoretic Regret Bounds for Online Nonlinear Controlcited by 90
  8. 2018Regret Bounds for Robust Adaptive Control of the Linear Quadratic Regulatorcited by 86
  9. 2020Improper Learning for Non-Stochastic Controlcited by 83
  10. 2018Non-asymptotic Identification of LTI Systems from a Single Trajectorycited by 78
  11. 2019Learning Linear-Quadratic Regulators Efficiently with only √T Regretcited by 70
  12. 2019The Nonstochastic Control Problemcited by 52
13 more
  1. 2020Logarithmic Regret Bound in Partially Observable Linear Dynamical Systemscited by 46
  2. 2020Adaptive Regret for Control of Time-Varying Dynamicscited by 38
  3. 2020Regret Bounds for Adaptive Nonlinear Controlcited by 25
  4. 2019Adaptive Regret of Convex and Smooth Functionscited by 24
  5. 2020Making Non-Stochastic Control (Almost) as Easy as Stochasticcited by 24
  6. 2020Learning the Linear Quadratic Regulator from Nonlinear Observationscited by 21
  7. 2020Certainty Equivalent Perception-Based Controlcited by 11
  8. 2016A System Level Approach to Controller Synthesiscited by 9
  9. 2021A Regret Minimization Approach to Iterative Learning Controlcited by 8
  10. 2020Regret Minimization in Partially Observable Linear Quadratic Controlcited by 7
  11. 2019Iterative Linearized Control: Stable Algorithms and Complexity Guaranteescited by 5
  12. 2021On the Stability of Nonlinear Receding Horizon Control: A Geometric Perspectivecited by 4
  13. 2021Stable Online Control of Linear Time-Varying Systemscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 5; 2023: 3; 2024: 1; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

13 papers.

Sort: