mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Making Non-Stochastic Control (Almost) as Easy as Stochastic

arXiv 2006.05910 ↗First posted 10 Jun 2020cs.LG math.OC stat.MLcited by 24

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent literature has made much progress in understanding online LQR: a modern learning-theoretic take on the classical control problem in which a learner attempts to optimally control an unknown linear dynamical system with fully observed state, perturbed by i.i.d. Gaussian noise. It is now understood that the optimal regret on time horizon T against the optimal control law scales as widetildeTheta(√T). In this paper, we show that the same regret rate (against a suitable benchmark) is attainable even in the considerably more general non-stochastic control model, where the system is driven by arbitrary adversarial noise (Agarwal et al. 2019). In other words, stochasticity confers little benefit in online LQR. We attain the optimal widetildeO(√T) regret when the dynamics are unknown to the learner, and poly(log T) regret when known, provided that the cost functions are strongly convex (as in LQR). Our algorithm is based on a novel variant of online Newton step (Hazan et al. 2007), which adapts to the geometry induced by possibly adversarial disturbances, and our analysis hinges on generic "policy regret" bounds for certain structured losses in the OCO-with-memory framework (Anava et al. 2015). Moreover, our results accomodate the full generality of the non-stochastic control setting: adversarially chosen (possibly non-quadratic) costs, partial state observation, and fully adversarial process and observation noise.

Key facts. Cited by 24 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 10 Jun 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 5; 2022: 6; 2023: 5; 2024: 5; 2025: 3.

24 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2021Non-stationary Online Learning with Memory and Non-stochastic Controlcited by 33
  2. 2021Adversarial Tracking Control via Strongly Adaptive Online Learning with Memorycited by 14
  3. 2023Butterfly Effects of SGD Noise: Error Amplification in Behavior Cloning and Autoregressioncited by 14
  4. 2022Online Control of Unknown Time-Varying Dynamical Systemscited by 13
  5. 2021Regret-optimal Estimation and Controlcited by 10
  6. 2021Learning from Censored and Dependent Data: The case of Linear Dynamicscited by 9
  7. 2022Optimal Comparator Adaptive Online Learning with Switching Costcited by 9
  8. 2021A Regret Minimization Approach to Iterative Learning Controlcited by 8
  9. 2023Optimal Rates for Bandit Nonstochastic Controlcited by 7
  10. 2022Optimal Dynamic Regret in LQR Controlcited by 6
  11. 2022Best of Both Worlds in Online Control: Competitive Ratio and Policy Regretcited by 5
  12. 2024Predictive Linear Online Tracking for Unknown Targetscited by 5
12 more
  1. 2022Efficient Online Linear Control with Stochastic Convex Costs and Unknown Dynamicscited by 4
  2. 2023Adaptive Online Non-stochastic Controlcited by 3
  3. 2024Optimistic Online Non-stochastic Control via FTRLcited by 3
  4. 2022Optimal Competitive-Ratio Controlcited by 2
  5. 2023Online Nonstochastic Model-Free Reinforcement Learningcited by 2
  6. 2024Online Control in Population Dynamicscited by 2
  7. 2024Combining Federated Learning and Control: A Surveycited by 2
  8. 2024Tight Rates for Bandit Control Beyond Quadraticscited by 2
  9. 2025Explore-then-Commit for Nonstationary Linear Bandits with Latent Dynamicscited by 2
  10. 2025A Simple, Optimal and Efficient Algorithm for Online Exp-Concave Optimizationcited by 2
  11. 2023Learning to Seek: Multi-Agent Online Source Seeking Against Non-Stochastic Disturbancescited by 0
  12. 2025Online Multi-Agent Control with Adversarial Disturbancescited by 0