Trustworthy Anomaly Detection: A Survey
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Anomaly detection has a wide range of real-world applications, such as bank fraud detection and cyber intrusion detection. In the past decade, a variety of anomaly detection models have been developed, which lead to big progress towards accurately detecting various anomalies. Despite the successes, anomaly detection models still face many limitations. The most significant one is whether we can trust the detection results from the models. In recent years, the research community has spent a great effort to design trustworthy machine learning models, such as developing trustworthy classification models. However, the attention to anomaly detection tasks is far from sufficient. Considering that many anomaly detection tasks are life-changing tasks involving human beings, labeling someone as anomalies or fraudsters should be extremely cautious. Hence, ensuring the anomaly detection models conducted in a trustworthy fashion is an essential requirement to deploy the models to conduct automatic decisions in the real world. In this brief survey, we summarize the existing efforts and discuss open problems towards trustworthy anomaly detection from the perspectives of interpretability, fairness, robustness, and privacy-preservation.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 34 of its 65 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Feb 2022.
Builds on
34 of 65 references.
References · 34
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
- 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
- 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
- 2017Targeted Backdoor Attacks on Deep Learning Systems Using Data Poisoningcited by 1,012
- 2016Adversarial Machine Learning at Scalecited by 934
- 2021CutPaste: Self-Supervised Learning for Anomaly Detection and Localizationcited by 529
- 2019Using Self-Supervised Learning Can Improve Model Robustness and Uncertaintycited by 511
- 2020A Unifying Review of Deep and Shallow Anomaly Detectioncited by 423
- 2019Differential Privacy Has Disparate Impact on Model Accuracycited by 316
- 2019Deep Semi-Supervised Anomaly Detectioncited by 290
- 2018Adversarial Attacks and Defences: A Surveycited by 259
22 more
- 2018Techniques for Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 237
- 2020To be Robust or to be Fair: Towards Fairness in Adversarial Trainingcited by 137
- 2020Explainable Deep One-Class Classificationcited by 126
- 2019Robust Anomaly Detection and Backdoor Attack Detection Via Differential Privacycited by 93
- 2021Trustworthy AI: A Computational Perspectivecited by 93
- 2021Explainable Deep Few-shot Anomaly Detection with Deviation Networkscited by 69
- 2021Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning: Methods, Challenges and Directionscited by 58
- 2020Exathlon: A Benchmark for Explainable Anomaly Detection over Time Seriescited by 56
- 2021Socially Responsible AI Algorithms: Issues, Purposes, and Challengescited by 56
- 2018Stakeholders in Explainable AIcited by 48
- 2019GEE: A Gradient-based Explainable Variational Autoencoder for Network Anomaly Detectioncited by 36
- 2019Explaining Anomalies Detected by Autoencoders Using SHAPcited by 27
- 2020Interpretable, Multidimensional, Multimodal Anomaly Detection with Negative Sampling for Detection of Device Failurecited by 27
- 2018Towards Explaining Anomalies: A Deep Taylor Decomposition of One-Class Modelscited by 24
- 2020FairOD: Fairness-aware Outlier Detectioncited by 24
- 2020Towards Fair Deep Anomaly Detectioncited by 24
- 2021Adversarially Robust One-class Novelty Detectioncited by 24
- 2018Recurrent Neural Network Attention Mechanisms for Interpretable System Log Anomaly Detectioncited by 21
- 2021Deep Clustering based Fair Outlier Detectioncited by 19
- 2018Scalable and Interpretable One-class SVMs with Deep Learning and Random Fourier featurescited by 14
- 2020Fair Outlier Detectioncited by 10
- 2015Differentially Private Analysis of Outlierscited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
5 papers.
- 2023One-class Damage Detector Using Deeper Fully-Convolutional Data Descriptions for Civil Applicationcited by 5
- 2024Differential Privacy for Anomaly Detection: Analyzing the Trade-off Between Privacy and Explainabilitycited by 2
- 2024Adaptive Anomaly Detection for Identifying Attacks in Cyber-Physical Systems: A Systematic Literature Reviewcited by 2
- 2023Few-shot 1/a Anomalies Feedback : Damage Vision Mining Opportunity and Embedding Feature Imbalancecited by 1
- 2026Autonomous VR-Based Risk Detection for Situational Awareness in Dangerous Settingscited by 0
- 2026Autonomous VR-Based Risk Detection for Situational Awareness in Dangerous Settings18 Jul 2026
- 2024Adaptive Anomaly Detection for Identifying Attacks in Cyber-Physical Systems: A Systematic Literature Review21 Nov 2024
- 2024Differential Privacy for Anomaly Detection: Analyzing the Trade-off Between Privacy and Explainability9 Apr 2024
- 2023Few-shot 1/a Anomalies Feedback : Damage Vision Mining Opportunity and Embedding Feature Imbalance24 Jul 2023
- 2023One-class Damage Detector Using Deeper Fully-Convolutional Data Descriptions for Civil Application3 Mar 2023