mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

LIMREF: Local Interpretable Model Agnostic Rule-based Explanations for Forecasting, with an Application to Electricity Smart Meter Data

arXiv 2202.07766 ↗First posted 15 Feb 2022cs.LG cs.AIcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Accurate electricity demand forecasts play a crucial role in sustainable power systems. To enable better decision-making especially for demand flexibility of the end-user, it is necessary to provide not only accurate but also understandable and actionable forecasts. To provide accurate forecasts Global Forecasting Models (GFM) trained across time series have shown superior results in many demand forecasting competitions and real-world applications recently, compared with univariate forecasting approaches. We aim to fill the gap between the accuracy and the interpretability in global forecasting approaches. In order to explain the global model forecasts, we propose Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Rule-based Explanations for Forecasting (LIMREF), a local explainer framework that produces k-optimal impact rules for a particular forecast, considering the global forecasting model as a black-box model, in a model-agnostic way. It provides different types of rules that explain the forecast of the global model and the counterfactual rules, which provide actionable insights for potential changes to obtain different outputs for given instances. We conduct experiments using a large-scale electricity demand dataset with exogenous features such as temperature and calendar effects. Here, we evaluate the quality of the explanations produced by the LIMREF framework in terms of both qualitative and quantitative aspects such as accuracy, fidelity, and comprehensibility and benchmark those against other local explainers.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Feb 2022.

Builds on

14 of 48 references.

References · 14

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  2. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  3. 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,454
  4. 2017Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPRcited by 1,086
  5. 2017DeepAR: Probabilistic Forecasting with Autoregressive Recurrent Networkscited by 1,004
  6. 2018Actionable Recourse in Linear Classificationcited by 327
  7. 2019FACE: Feasible and Actionable Counterfactual Explanationscited by 232
  8. 2019Model-Agnostic Counterfactual Explanations for Consequential Decisionscited by 204
  9. 2019Recurrent Neural Networks for Time Series Forecasting: Current Status and Future Directionscited by 172
  10. 2019Preserving Causal Constraints in Counterfactual Explanations for Machine Learning Classifierscited by 143
  11. 2020Kaggle forecasting competitions: An overlooked learning opportunitycited by 55
  12. 2019Sales Demand Forecast in E-commerce using a Long Short-Term Memory Neural Network Methodologycited by 18
2 more
  1. 2019LoRMIkA: Local rule-based model interpretability with k-optimal associationscited by 10
  2. 2021SQAPlanner: Generating Data-Informed Software Quality Improvement Planscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 3; 2024: 2.

6 papers.