mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Explainable Predictive Process Monitoring: A User Evaluation

arXiv 2202.07760 ↗First posted 15 Feb 2022cs.AIcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Explainability is motivated by the lack of transparency of black-box Machine Learning approaches, which do not foster trust and acceptance of Machine Learning algorithms. This also happens in the Predictive Process Monitoring field, where predictions, obtained by applying Machine Learning techniques, need to be explained to users, so as to gain their trust and acceptance. In this work, we carry on a user evaluation on explanation approaches for Predictive Process Monitoring aiming at investigating whether and how the explanations provided (i) are understandable; (ii) are useful in decision making tasks;(iii) can be further improved for process analysts, with different Machine Learning expertise levels. The results of the user evaluation show that, although explanation plots are overall understandable and useful for decision making tasks for Business Process Management users -- with and without experience in Machine Learning -- differences exist in the comprehension and usage of different plots, as well as in the way users with different Machine Learning expertise understand and use them.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 80 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Feb 2022.

Builds on

17 of 80 references.

References · 17

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  2. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  3. 2020Evaluating Explainable AI: Which Algorithmic Explanations Help Users Predict Model Behavior?cited by 189
  4. 2016Predictive Business Process Monitoring with LSTM Neural Networkscited by 103
  5. 2020Evaluating Saliency Map Explanations for Convolutional Neural Networks: A User Studycited by 86
  6. 2019explAIner: A Visual Analytics Framework for Interactive and Explainable Machine Learningcited by 69
  7. 2016Predicting Process Behaviour using Deep Learningcited by 59
  8. 2018Survey and cross-benchmark comparison of remaining time prediction methods in business process monitoringcited by 43
  9. 2013Predictive Monitoring of Business Processescited by 37
  10. 2018Predictive Process Monitoring Methods: Which One Suits Me Best?cited by 27
  11. 2020Explainable Predictive Process Monitoringcited by 27
  12. 2015Clustering-Based Predictive Process Monitoringcited by 24
5 more
  1. 2016Time and Activity Sequence Prediction of Business Process Instancescited by 24
  2. 2020Prescriptive Business Process Monitoring for Recommending Next Best Actionscited by 22
  3. 2021Prescriptive Process Monitoring for Cost-Aware Cycle Time Reductioncited by 17
  4. 2020XNAP: Making LSTM-based Next Activity Predictions Explainable by Using LRPcited by 12
  5. 2017Temporal Stability in Predictive Process Monitoringcited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.

3 papers.