Adversarial Attacks and Defense Methods for Power Quality Recognition
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Vulnerability of various machine learning methods to adversarial examples has been recently explored in the literature. Power systems which use these vulnerable methods face a huge threat against adversarial examples. To this end, we first propose a signal-specific method and a universal signal-agnostic method to attack power systems using generated adversarial examples. Black-box attacks based on transferable characteristics and the above two methods are also proposed and evaluated. We then adopt adversarial training to defend systems against adversarial attacks. Experimental analyses demonstrate that our signal-specific attack method provides less perturbation compared to the FGSM (Fast Gradient Sign Method), and our signal-agnostic attack method can generate perturbations fooling most natural signals with high probability. What's more, the attack method based on the universal signal-agnostic algorithm has a higher transfer rate of black-box attacks than the attack method based on the signal-specific algorithm. In addition, the results show that the proposed adversarial training improves robustness of power systems to adversarial examples.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Feb 2022.
Builds on
28 of 48 references.
References · 28
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2018The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metriccited by 11,029
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
- 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
- 2016Adversarial examples in the physical worldcited by 1,762
- 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,510
- 2015DeepFool: a simple and accurate method to fool deep neural networkscited by 1,315
- 2016Practical Black-Box Attacks against Machine Learningcited by 893
- 2015The Limitations of Deep Learning in Adversarial Settingscited by 784
- 2016Universal adversarial perturbationscited by 774
- 2017One pixel attack for fooling deep neural networkscited by 579
16 more
- 2017Provable defenses against adversarial examples via the convex outer adversarial polytopecited by 564
- 2016Transferability in Machine Learning: from Phenomena to Black-Box Attacks using Adversarial Samplescited by 439
- 2014On the Number of Linear Regions of Deep Neural Networkscited by 378
- 2016On the Expressive Power of Deep Neural Networkscited by 302
- 2019Adversarial Attacks and Defenses in Images, Graphs and Text: A Reviewcited by 234
- 2018Backdoor Embedding in Convolutional Neural Network Models via Invisible Perturbationcited by 131
- 2018SparseFool: a few pixels make a big differencecited by 94
- 2017SafetyNet: Detecting and Rejecting Adversarial Examples Robustlycited by 76
- 2015Learning with a Strong Adversarycited by 68
- 2019Verification of Neural Network Behaviour: Formal Guarantees for Power System Applicationscited by 26
- 2019Exploiting Vulnerabilities of Load Forecasting Through Adversarial Attackscited by 18
- 2018Is Machine Learning in Power Systems Vulnerable?cited by 12
- 2020Adversarial Concurrent Training: Optimizing Robustness and Accuracy Trade-off of Deep Neural Networkscited by 9
- 2019Adversarial FDI Attack against AC State Estimation with ANNcited by 3
- 2020From Sound Representation to Model Robustnesscited by 2
- 2020Enabling Cyberattack-Resilient Load Forecasting through Adversarial Machine Learningcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.