Adversarial Concurrent Training: Optimizing Robustness and Accuracy Trade-off of Deep Neural Networks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Adversarial training has been proven to be an effective technique for improving the adversarial robustness of models. However, there seems to be an inherent trade-off between optimizing the model for accuracy and robustness. To this end, we propose Adversarial Concurrent Training (ACT), which employs adversarial training in a collaborative learning framework whereby we train a robust model in conjunction with a natural model in a minimax game. ACT encourages the two models to align their feature space by using the task-specific decision boundaries and explore the input space more broadly. Furthermore, the natural model acts as a regularizer, enforcing priors on features that the robust model should learn. Our analyses on the behavior of the models show that ACT leads to a robust model with lower model complexity, higher information compression in the learned representations, and high posterior entropy solutions indicative of convergence to a flatter minima. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach across different datasets and network architectures. On ImageNet, ACT achieves 68.20% standard accuracy and 44.29% robustness accuracy under a 100-iteration untargeted attack, improving upon the standard adversarial training method's 65.70% standard accuracy and 42.36% robustness.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 16 Aug 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 4; 2023: 2; 2024: 2.
9 papers.
- 2021Mutual Adversarial Training: Learning together is better than going alonecited by 17
- 2022A.I. Robustness: a Human-Centered Perspective on Technological Challenges and Opportunitiescited by 8
- 2024Conserve-Update-Revise to Cure Generalization and Robustness Trade-off in Adversarial Trainingcited by 6
- 2022InBiaseD: Inductive Bias Distillation to Improve Generalization and Robustness through Shape-awarenesscited by 5
- 2022On the uncertainty principle of neural networkscited by 4
- 2024Quantum-Inspired Analysis of Neural Network Vulnerabilities: The Role of Conjugate Variables in System Attackscited by 4
- 2023Topology-preserving Adversarial Training for Alleviating Natural Accuracy Degradationcited by 1
- 2022Adversarial Attacks and Defense Methods for Power Quality Recognitioncited by 0
- 2023Training Image Derivatives: Increased Accuracy and Universal Robustnesscited by 0
- 2024Quantum-Inspired Analysis of Neural Network Vulnerabilities: The Role of Conjugate Variables in System Attacks16 Feb 2024
- 2024Conserve-Update-Revise to Cure Generalization and Robustness Trade-off in Adversarial Training26 Jan 2024
- 2023Topology-preserving Adversarial Training for Alleviating Natural Accuracy Degradation29 Nov 2023
- 2023Training Image Derivatives: Increased Accuracy and Universal Robustness21 Oct 2023
- 2022A.I. Robustness: a Human-Centered Perspective on Technological Challenges and Opportunities17 Oct 2022
- 2022InBiaseD: Inductive Bias Distillation to Improve Generalization and Robustness through Shape-awareness12 Jun 2022
- 2022On the uncertainty principle of neural networks3 May 2022
- 2022Adversarial Attacks and Defense Methods for Power Quality Recognition11 Feb 2022
- 2021Mutual Adversarial Training: Learning together is better than going alone9 Dec 2021