mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Learning to Mitigate AI Collusion on Economic Platforms

arXiv 2202.07106 ↗First posted 15 Feb 2022cs.MA cs.AIcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Algorithmic pricing on online e-commerce platforms raises the concern of tacit collusion, where reinforcement learning algorithms learn to set collusive prices in a decentralized manner and through nothing more than profit feedback. This raises the question as to whether collusive pricing can be prevented through the design of suitable "buy boxes," i.e., through the design of the rules that govern the elements of e-commerce sites that promote particular products and prices to consumers. In this paper, we demonstrate that reinforcement learning (RL) can also be used by platforms to learn buy box rules that are effective in preventing collusion by RL sellers. For this, we adopt the methodology of Stackelberg POMDPs, and demonstrate success in learning robust rules that continue to provide high consumer welfare together with sellers employing different behavior models or having out-of-distribution costs for goods.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 68 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Feb 2022.

Builds on

21 of 68 references.

References · 21

  1. 2017Multi-Agent Actor-Critic for Mixed Cooperative-Competitive Environmentscited by 1,519
  2. 2020The AI Economist: Improving Equality and Productivity with AI-Driven Tax Policiescited by 75
  3. 2018Automated Mechanism Design via Neural Networkscited by 31
  4. 2020A Permutation-Equivariant Neural Network Architecture For Auction Designcited by 31
  5. 2022Why Should I Trust You, Bellman? The Bellman Error is a Poor Replacement for Value Errorcited by 31
  6. 2020Auction learning as a two-player gamecited by 29
  7. 2018M3RL: Mind-aware Multi-agent Management Reinforcement Learningcited by 22
  8. 2021PreferenceNet: Encoding Human Preferences in Auction Design with Deep Learningcited by 22
  9. 2020Certifying Strategyproof Auction Networkscited by 21
  10. 2020ProportionNet: Balancing Fairness and Revenue for Auction Design with Deep Learningcited by 19
  11. 2020Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning in Bayesian Stackelberg Markov Games for Adaptive Moving Target Defensecited by 14
  12. 2021Learning Revenue-Maximizing Auctions With Differentiable Matchingcited by 14
9 more
  1. 2021The AI Economist: Optimal Economic Policy Design via Two-level Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 14
  2. 2019Deep Learning-powered Iterative Combinatorial Auctionscited by 12
  3. 2021Robust Reinforcement Learning Under Minimax Regret for Green Securitycited by 12
  4. 2017Reinforcement Mechanism Design, with Applications to Dynamic Pricing in Sponsored Search Auctionscited by 11
  5. 2019Coordinating the Crowd: Inducing Desirable Equilibria in Non-Cooperative Systemscited by 11
  6. 2021Coordinating Followers to Reach Better Equilibria: End-to-End Gradient Descent for Stackelberg Gamescited by 10
  7. 2021Convex-Concave Min-Max Stackelberg Gamescited by 9
  8. 2020Reinforcement Learning of Sequential Price Mechanismscited by 6
  9. 2020Model-free Reinforcement Learning for Stochastic Stackelberg Security Gamescited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 0; 2024: 2; 2025: 3; 2026: 2.

9 papers.