mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Stochastic linear optimization never overfits with quadratically-bounded losses on general data

arXiv 2202.06915 ↗First posted 14 Feb 2022cs.LG math.OC stat.MLcited by 16

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This work provides test error bounds for iterative fixed point methods on linear predictors -- specifically, stochastic and batch mirror descent (MD), and stochastic temporal difference learning (TD) -- with two core contributions: (a) a single proof technique which gives high probability guarantees despite the absence of projections, regularization, or any equivalents, even when optima have large or infinite norm, for quadratically-bounded losses (e.g., providing unified treatment of squared and logistic losses); (b) locally-adapted rates which depend not on global problem structure (such as condition numbers and maximum margins), but rather on properties of low norm predictors which may suffer some small excess test error. The proof technique is an elementary and versatile coupling argument, and is demonstrated here in the following settings: stochastic MD under realizability; stochastic MD for general Markov data; batch MD for general IID data; stochastic MD on heavy-tailed data (still without projections); stochastic TD on Markov chains (all prior stochastic TD bounds are in expectation).

Key facts. Cited by 16 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Feb 2022.

Builds on

28 of 56 references.

References · 28

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,657
  3. 2017The Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent on Separable Datacited by 649
  4. 2014Convex Optimization: Algorithms and Complexitycited by 569
  5. 2015Train faster, generalize better: Stability of stochastic gradient descentcited by 547
  6. 2019Implicit Regularization in Deep Matrix Factorizationcited by 402
  7. 2014In Search of the Real Inductive Bias: On the Role of Implicit Regularization in Deep Learningcited by 339
  8. 2019Gradient Descent Maximizes the Margin of Homogeneous Neural Networkscited by 308
  9. 2020Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent for Wide Two-layer Neural Networks Trained with the Logistic Losscited by 267
  10. 2018Characterizing Implicit Bias in Terms of Optimization Geometrycited by 259
  11. 2018A Finite Time Analysis of Temporal Difference Learning With Linear Function Approximationcited by 225
  12. 2014Taming the Monster: A Fast and Simple Algorithm for Contextual Banditscited by 200
16 more
  1. 2018Gradient descent aligns the layers of deep linear networkscited by 182
  2. 2020Directional convergence and alignment in deep learningcited by 172
  3. 2019Global Optimality Guarantees For Policy Gradient Methodscited by 146
  4. 2018Black-Box Reductions for Parameter-free Online Learning in Banach Spacescited by 124
  5. 2020Stochastic Optimization with Heavy-Tailed Noise via Accelerated Gradient Clippingcited by 104
  6. 2018Tight Analyses for Non-Smooth Stochastic Gradient Descentcited by 94
  7. 2019Finite-Sample Analysis for SARSA with Linear Function Approximationcited by 85
  8. 2018Risk and parameter convergence of logistic regressioncited by 81
  9. 2020A High Probability Analysis of Adaptive SGD with Momentumcited by 61
  10. 2013Margins, Shrinkage, and Boostingcited by 35
  11. 2019Algorithms of Robust Stochastic Optimization Based on Mirror Descent Methodcited by 32
  12. 2020Gradient Methods Never Overfit On Separable Datacited by 29
  13. 2020The Statistical Complexity of Early-Stopped Mirror Descentcited by 19
  14. 2021Actor-critic is implicitly biased towards high entropy optimal policiescited by 13
  15. 2020Direction Matters: On the Implicit Bias of Stochastic Gradient Descent with Moderate Learning Ratecited by 12
  16. 2013Moment-based Uniform Deviation Bounds for k-means and Friendscited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 5; 2024: 2; 2025: 4; 2026: 3.

16 papers.

Sort: