mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Actor-critic is implicitly biased towards high entropy optimal policies

arXiv 2110.11280 ↗First posted 21 Oct 2021cs.LGcited by 13

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We show that the simplest actor-critic method -- a linear softmax policy updated with TD through interaction with a linear MDP, but featuring no explicit regularization or exploration -- does not merely find an optimal policy, but moreover prefers high entropy optimal policies. To demonstrate the strength of this bias, the algorithm not only has no regularization, no projections, and no exploration like ε-greedy, but is moreover trained on a single trajectory with no resets. The key consequence of the high entropy bias is that uniform mixing assumptions on the MDP, which exist in some form in all prior work, can be dropped: the implicit regularization of the high entropy bias is enough to ensure that all chains mix and an optimal policy is reached with high probability. As auxiliary contributions, this work decouples concerns between the actor and critic by writing the actor update as an explicit mirror descent, provides tools to uniformly bound mixing times within KL balls of policy space, and provides a projection-free TD analysis with its own implicit bias which can be run from an unmixed starting distribution.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Oct 2021.

Builds on

22 of 53 references.

References · 22

  1. 2016Asynchronous Methods for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 2,218
  2. 2017The Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent on Separable Datacited by 649
  3. 2014Convex Optimization: Algorithms and Complexitycited by 569
  4. 2018Maximum a Posteriori Policy Optimisationcited by 318
  5. 2019Gradient Descent Maximizes the Margin of Homogeneous Neural Networkscited by 308
  6. 2019A Theory of Regularized Markov Decision Processescited by 279
  7. 2020Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent for Wide Two-layer Neural Networks Trained with the Logistic Losscited by 267
  8. 2018A Finite Time Analysis of Temporal Difference Learning With Linear Function Approximationcited by 225
  9. 2018Global Convergence of Policy Gradient Methods for the Linear Quadratic Regulatorcited by 211
  10. 2020Fast Global Convergence of Natural Policy Gradient Methods with Entropy Regularizationcited by 170
  11. 2019Finite-Time Error Bounds For Linear Stochastic Approximation and TD Learningcited by 165
  12. 2019Neural Policy Gradient Methods: Global Optimality and Rates of Convergencecited by 157
10 more
  1. 2019Polylogarithmic width suffices for gradient descent to achieve arbitrarily small test error with shallow ReLU networkscited by 120
  2. 2019Adaptive Trust Region Policy Optimization: Global Convergence and Faster Rates for Regularized MDPscited by 113
  3. 2019Finite-Sample Analysis for SARSA with Linear Function Approximationcited by 85
  4. 2019How Much Over-parameterization Is Sufficient to Learn Deep ReLU Networks?cited by 84
  5. 2018Risk and parameter convergence of logistic regressioncited by 81
  6. 2020Non-asymptotic Convergence Analysis of Two Time-scale (Natural) Actor-Critic Algorithmscited by 43
  7. 2021Finite Sample Analysis of Two-Time-Scale Natural Actor-Critic Algorithmcited by 39
  8. 2013Margins, Shrinkage, and Boostingcited by 35
  9. 2020Gradient Methods Never Overfit On Separable Datacited by 29
  10. 2019Neural Temporal-Difference and Q-Learning Provably Converge to Global Optimacited by 20

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 6; 2023: 2; 2024: 4; 2025: 1.

13 papers.

Sort:

By area: