Direction Matters: On the Implicit Bias of Stochastic Gradient Descent with Moderate Learning Rate
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Understanding the algorithmic bias of stochastic gradient descent (SGD) is one of the key challenges in modern machine learning and deep learning theory. Most of the existing works, however, focus on very small or even infinitesimal learning rate regime, and fail to cover practical scenarios where the learning rate is moderate and annealing. In this paper, we make an initial attempt to characterize the particular regularization effect of SGD in the moderate learning rate regime by studying its behavior for optimizing an overparameterized linear regression problem. In this case, SGD and GD are known to converge to the unique minimum-norm solution; however, with the moderate and annealing learning rate, we show that they exhibit different directional bias: SGD converges along the large eigenvalue directions of the data matrix, while GD goes after the small eigenvalue directions. Furthermore, we show that such directional bias does matter when early stopping is adopted, where the SGD output is nearly optimal but the GD output is suboptimal. Finally, our theory explains several folk arts in practice used for SGD hyperparameter tuning, such as (1) linearly scaling the initial learning rate with batch size; and (2) overrunning SGD with high learning rate even when the loss stops decreasing.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 4 Nov 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 6; 2022: 6.
12 papers.
- 2021Learning to Optimize: A Primer and A Benchmarkcited by 208
- 2022SGD with Large Step Sizes Learns Sparse Featurescited by 68
- 2021Positive-Negative Momentum: Manipulating Stochastic Gradient Noise to Improve Generalizationcited by 28
- 2021A Theoretical Analysis of Fine-tuning with Linear Teacherscited by 17
- 2022Stochastic linear optimization never overfits with quadratically-bounded losses on general datacited by 17
- 2021Mean-field Analysis of Piecewise Linear Solutions for Wide ReLU Networkscited by 13
- 2022On the Overlooked Structure of Stochastic Gradientscited by 13
- 2022Implicit Regularization Properties of Variance Reduced Stochastic Mirror Descentcited by 1
- 2022The Directional Bias Helps Stochastic Gradient Descent to Generalize in Kernel Regression Modelscited by 1
- 2021Painless step size adaptation for SGDcited by 0
- 2021Neurons learn slower than they thinkcited by 0
- 2022Towards understanding deep learning with the natural clustering priorcited by 0
- 2022On the Overlooked Structure of Stochastic Gradients5 Dec 2022
- 2022SGD with Large Step Sizes Learns Sparse Features11 Oct 2022
- 2022The Directional Bias Helps Stochastic Gradient Descent to Generalize in Kernel Regression Models29 Apr 2022
- 2022Implicit Regularization Properties of Variance Reduced Stochastic Mirror Descent29 Apr 2022
- 2022Towards understanding deep learning with the natural clustering prior15 Mar 2022
- 2022Stochastic linear optimization never overfits with quadratically-bounded losses on general data14 Feb 2022
- 2021Mean-field Analysis of Piecewise Linear Solutions for Wide ReLU Networks3 Nov 2021
- 2021A Theoretical Analysis of Fine-tuning with Linear Teachers4 Jul 2021
- 2021Neurons learn slower than they think2 Apr 2021
- 2021Positive-Negative Momentum: Manipulating Stochastic Gradient Noise to Improve Generalization31 Mar 2021
- 2021Learning to Optimize: A Primer and A Benchmark23 Mar 2021
- 2021Painless step size adaptation for SGD1 Feb 2021