mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Explainable Machine Learning for Breakdown Prediction in High Gradient RF Cavities

arXiv 2202.05610 ↗First posted 10 Feb 2022physics.acc-ph cs.LGcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The occurrence of vacuum arcs or radio frequency (rf) breakdowns is one of the most prevalent factors limiting the high-gradient performance of normal conducting rf cavities in particle accelerators. In this paper, we search for the existence of previously unrecognized features related to the incidence of rf breakdowns by applying a machine learning strategy to high-gradient cavity data from CERN's test stand for the Compact Linear Collider (CLIC). By interpreting the parameters of the learned models with explainable artificial intelligence (AI), we reverse-engineer physical properties for deriving fast, reliable, and simple rule-based models. Based on 6 months of historical data and dedicated experiments, our models show fractions of data with a high influence on the occurrence of breakdowns. Specifically, it is shown that the field emitted current following an initial breakdown is closely related to the probability of another breakdown occurring shortly thereafter. Results also indicate that the cavity pressure should be monitored with increased temporal resolution in future experiments, to further explore the vacuum activity associated with breakdowns.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 80 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Feb 2022.

Builds on

20 of 80 references.

References · 20

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 6,979
  3. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  4. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  5. 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,348
  6. 2016Inception-v4, Inception-ResNet and the Impact of Residual Connections on Learningcited by 1,509
  7. 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,309
  8. 2017Grad-CAM++: Improved Visual Explanations for Deep Convolutional Networkscited by 936
  9. 2018Deep learning for time series classification: a reviewcited by 575
  10. 2019InceptionTime: Finding AlexNet for Time Series Classificationcited by 386
  11. 2016Time Series Classification from Scratch with Deep Neural Networks: A Strong Baselinecited by 358
  12. 2019Unsupervised Scalable Representation Learning for Multivariate Time Seriescited by 267
8 more
  1. 2019On Completeness-aware Concept-Based Explanations in Deep Neural Networkscited by 239
  2. 2020Dynamical Variational Autoencoders: A Comprehensive Reviewcited by 127
  3. 2020Feature Importance Ranking for Deep Learningcited by 31
  4. 2016Distributed and parallel time series feature extraction for industrial big data applicationscited by 29
  5. 2019A Survey of Predictive Maintenance: Systems, Purposes and Approachescited by 21
  6. 2017Kernel Feature Selection via Conditional Covariance Minimizationcited by 20
  7. 2020Superconducting radio-frequency cavity fault classification using machine learning at Jefferson Laboratorycited by 15
  8. 2017EVE: Explainable Vector Based Embedding Technique Using Wikipediacited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

3 papers.