mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

SwiftAgg: Communication-Efficient and Dropout-Resistant Secure Aggregation for Federated Learning with Worst-Case Security Guarantees

arXiv 2202.04169 ↗First posted 8 Feb 2022cs.IT cs.DC cs.LGcited by 14

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We propose SwiftAgg, a novel secure aggregation protocol for federated learning systems, where a central server aggregates local models of N distributed users, each of size L, trained on their local data, in a privacy-preserving manner. Compared with state-of-the-art secure aggregation protocols, SwiftAgg significantly reduces the communication overheads without any compromise on security. Specifically, in presence of at most D dropout users, SwiftAgg achieves a users-to-server communication load of (T+1)L and a users-to-users communication load of up to (N-1)(T+D+1)L, with a worst-case information-theoretic security guarantee, against any subset of up to T semi-honest users who may also collude with the curious server. The key idea of SwiftAgg is to partition the users into groups of size D+T+1, then in the first phase, secret sharing and aggregation of the individual models are performed within each group, and then in the second phase, model aggregation is performed on D+T+1 sequences of users across the groups. If a user in a sequence drops out in the second phase, the rest of the sequence remain silent. This design allows only a subset of users to communicate with each other, and only the users in a single group to directly communicate with the server, eliminating the requirements of 1) all-to-all communication network across users; and 2) all users communicating with the server, for other secure aggregation protocols. This helps to substantially slash the communication costs of the system.

Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 15 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Feb 2022.

Builds on

10 of 15 references.

References · 10

  1. 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
  2. 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,021
  3. 2019Federated Learning: Challenges, Methods, and Future Directionscited by 1,531
  4. 2019Deep Leakage from Gradientscited by 1,004
  5. 2020Inverting Gradients -- How easy is it to break privacy in federated learning?cited by 707
  6. 2016Practical Secure Aggregation for Federated Learning on User-Held Datacited by 178
  7. 2020Turbo-Aggregate: Breaking the Quadratic Aggregation Barrier in Secure Federated Learningcited by 78
  8. 2021LightSecAgg: a Lightweight and Versatile Design for Secure Aggregation in Federated Learningcited by 63
  9. 2020FastSecAgg: Scalable Secure Aggregation for Privacy-Preserving Federated Learningcited by 60
  10. 2020Communication-Computation Efficient Secure Aggregation for Federated Learningcited by 18

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 6; 2024: 2; 2025: 4.

14 papers.

Sort: