Data driven design of optical resonators
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Optical devices lie at the heart of most of the technology we see around us. When one actually wants to make such an optical device, one can predict its optical behavior using computational simulations of Maxwell's equations. If one then asks what the optimal design would be in order to obtain a certain optical behavior, the only way to go further would be to try out all of the possible designs and compute the electromagnetic spectrum they produce. When there are many design parameters, this brute force approach quickly becomes too computationally expensive. We therefore need other methods to create optimal optical devices. An alternative to the brute force approach is inverse design. In this paradigm, one starts from the desired optical response of a material and then determines the design parameters that are needed to obtain this optical response. There are many algorithms known in the literature that implement this inverse design. Some of the best performing, recent approaches are based on Deep Learning. The central idea is to train a neural network to predict the optical response for given design parameters. Since neural networks are completely differentiable, we can compute gradients of the response with respect to the design parameters. We can use these gradients to update the design parameters and get an optical response closer to the one we want. This allows us to obtain an optimal design much faster compared to the brute force approach. In my thesis, I use Deep Learning for the inverse design of the Fabry-P'erot resonator. This system can be described fully analytically and is therefore ideal to study.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Dec 2021.
Builds on
10 of 37 references.
References · 10
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2013Auto-Encoding Variational Bayescited by 3,980
- 2019Dota 2 with Large Scale Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,084
- 2016An overview of gradient descent optimization algorithmscited by 1,021
- 2018Activation Functions: Comparison of trends in Practice and Research for Deep Learningcited by 130
- 2018Discovering physical concepts with neural networkscited by 117
- 2018A high-bias, low-variance introduction to Machine Learning for physicistscited by 108
- 2018Graph Neural Networks for IceCube Signal Classificationcited by 24
- 2019Deep learning approach based on dimensionality reduction for designing electromagnetic nanostructurescited by 12
Built on by
Not cited yet.