mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Fair Interpretable Representation Learning with Correction Vectors

arXiv 2202.03078 ↗First posted 7 Feb 2022cs.LG cs.CYcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Neural network architectures have been extensively employed in the fair representation learning setting, where the objective is to learn a new representation for a given vector which is independent of sensitive information. Various representation debiasing techniques have been proposed in the literature. However, as neural networks are inherently opaque, these methods are hard to comprehend, which limits their usefulness. We propose a new framework for fair representation learning that is centered around the learning of "correction vectors", which have the same dimensionality as the given data vectors. Correction vectors may be computed either explicitly via architectural constraints or implicitly by training an invertible model based on Normalizing Flows. We show experimentally that several fair representation learning models constrained in such a way do not exhibit losses in ranking or classification performance. Furthermore, we demonstrate that state-of-the-art results can be achieved by the invertible model. Finally, we discuss the law standing of our methodology in light of recent legislation in the European Union.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Feb 2022.

Builds on

24 of 54 references.

References · 24

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  3. 2015Domain-Adversarial Training of Neural Networkscited by 3,023
  4. 2015Variational Inference with Normalizing Flowscited by 2,161
  5. 2016Density estimation using Real NVPcited by 2,029
  6. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
  7. 2014NICE: Non-linear Independent Components Estimationcited by 1,052
  8. 2017Counterfactual Fairnesscited by 802
  9. 2016Improving Variational Inference with Inverse Autoregressive Flowcited by 636
  10. 2014Deep Domain Confusion: Maximizing for Domain Invariancecited by 597
  11. 2017On Fairness and Calibrationcited by 406
  12. 2016Fairness Beyond Disparate Treatment & Disparate Impact: Learning Classification without Disparate Mistreatmentcited by 368
12 more
  1. 2015The Variational Fair Autoencodercited by 223
  2. 2017Controllable Invariance through Adversarial Feature Learningcited by 127
  3. 2017FA*IR: A Fair Top-k Ranking Algorithmcited by 113
  4. 2018Invariant Representations without Adversarial Trainingcited by 111
  5. 2016Measuring Fairness in Ranked Outputscited by 81
  6. 2020Hurtful Words: Quantifying Biases in Clinical Contextual Word Embeddingscited by 79
  7. 2019Pairwise Fairness for Ranking and Regressioncited by 58
  8. 2019AlignFlow: Cycle Consistent Learning from Multiple Domains via Normalizing Flowscited by 33
  9. 2017Provably Fair Representationscited by 22
  10. 2019FairSearch: A Tool For Fairness in Ranked Search Resultscited by 22
  11. 2019Pairwise Learning to Rank by Neural Networks Revisited: Reconstruction, Theoretical Analysis and Practical Performancecited by 13
  12. 2019Affirmative Action Policies for Top-k Candidates Selection, With an Application to the Design of Policies for University Admissionscited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 0; 2024: 1.

3 papers.