Redactor: A Data-centric and Individualized Defense Against Inference Attacks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Information leakage is becoming a critical problem as various information becomes publicly available by mistake, and machine learning models train on that data to provide services. As a result, one's private information could easily be memorized by such trained models. Unfortunately, deleting information is out of the question as the data is already exposed to the Web or third-party platforms. Moreover, we cannot necessarily control the labeling process and the model trainings by other parties either. In this setting, we study the problem of targeted disinformation generation where the goal is to dilute the data and thus make a model safer and more robust against inference attacks on a specific target (e.g., a person's profile) by only inserting new data. Our method finds the closest points to the target in the input space that will be labeled as a different class. Since we cannot control the labeling process, we instead conservatively estimate the labels probabilistically by combining decision boundaries of multiple classifiers using data programming techniques. Our experiments show that a probabilistic decision boundary can be a good proxy for labelers, and that our approach is effective in defending against inference attacks and can scale to large data.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Feb 2022.
Builds on
23 of 48 references.
References · 23
- 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,221
- 2017Targeted Backdoor Attacks on Deep Learning Systems Using Data Poisoningcited by 1,012
- 2019Modeling Tabular data using Conditional GANcited by 695
- 2019Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Net: Selective Forgetting in Deep Networkscited by 599
- 2016Delving into Transferable Adversarial Examples and Black-box Attackscited by 530
- 2019Certified Data Removal from Machine Learning Modelscited by 512
- 2018Poison Frogs! Targeted Clean-Label Poisoning Attacks on Neural Networkscited by 500
- 2021Deep Neural Networks and Tabular Data: A Surveycited by 489
- 2018ML-Leaks: Model and Data Independent Membership Inference Attacks and Defenses on Machine Learning Modelscited by 475
- 2019Making AI Forget You: Data Deletion in Machine Learningcited by 447
- 2020Label-Only Membership Inference Attackscited by 371
- 2017Snorkel: Rapid Training Data Creation with Weak Supervisioncited by 370
11 more
- 2020Amnesiac Machine Learningcited by 305
- 2017VEEGAN: Reducing Mode Collapse in GANs using Implicit Variational Learningcited by 199
- 2017Generating Multi-label Discrete Patient Records using Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 197
- 2018Data Synthesis based on Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 184
- 2019MemGuard: Defending against Black-Box Membership Inference Attacks via Adversarial Examplescited by 183
- 2020Forgetting Outside the Box: Scrubbing Deep Networks of Information Accessible from Input-Output Observationscited by 171
- 2019Transferable Clean-Label Poisoning Attacks on Deep Neural Netscited by 129
- 2018Synthesizing Tabular Data using Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 92
- 2018Technical Report: When Does Machine Learning FAIL? Generalized Transferability for Evasion and Poisoning Attackscited by 78
- 2019Imperceptible Adversarial Attacks on Tabular Datacited by 35
- 2018Have You Stolen My Model? Evasion Attacks Against Deep Neural Network Watermarking Techniquescited by 10
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.