mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Learning Features with Parameter-Free Layers

arXiv 2202.02777 ↗First posted 6 Feb 2022cs.CV cs.LGcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Trainable layers such as convolutional building blocks are the standard network design choices by learning parameters to capture the global context through successive spatial operations. When designing an efficient network, trainable layers such as the depthwise convolution is the source of efficiency in the number of parameters and FLOPs, but there was little improvement to the model speed in practice. This paper argues that simple built-in parameter-free operations can be a favorable alternative to the efficient trainable layers replacing spatial operations in a network architecture. We aim to break the stereotype of organizing the spatial operations of building blocks into trainable layers. Extensive experimental analyses based on layer-level studies with fully-trained models and neural architecture searches are provided to investigate whether parameter-free operations such as the max-pool are functional. The studies eventually give us a simple yet effective idea for redesigning network architectures, where the parameter-free operations are heavily used as the main building block without sacrificing the model accuracy as much. Experimental results on the ImageNet dataset demonstrate that the network architectures with parameter-free operations could enjoy the advantages of further efficiency in terms of model speed, the number of the parameters, and FLOPs. Code and ImageNet pretrained models are available at https://github.com/naver-ai/PfLayer.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 55 of its 68 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Feb 2022.

Builds on

55 of 68 references.

References · 55

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  4. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  5. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  6. 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,617
  7. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
  8. 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 6,979
  9. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
  10. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
  11. 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,415
  12. 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,451
38 more
  1. 2016Feature Pyramid Networks for Object Detectioncited by 5,021
  2. 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 4,993
  3. 2018MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottleneckscited by 4,773
  4. 2017Squeeze-and-Excitation Networkscited by 4,763
  5. 2020Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attentioncited by 4,560
  6. 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,231
  7. 2017MobileNets: Efficient Convolutional Neural Networks for Mobile Vision Applicationscited by 3,827
  8. 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,057
  9. 2019CutMix: Regularization Strategy to Train Strong Classifiers with Localizable Featurescited by 2,875
  10. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
  11. 2016Aggregated Residual Transformations for Deep Neural Networkscited by 2,540
  12. 2019Searching for MobileNetV3cited by 1,984
  13. 2016Identity Mappings in Deep Residual Networkscited by 1,960
  14. 2018DARTS: Differentiable Architecture Searchcited by 1,782
  15. 2017Deformable Convolutional Networkscited by 1,481
  16. 2017Accurate, Large Minibatch SGD: Training ImageNet in 1 Hourcited by 1,479
  17. 2019Natural Adversarial Examplescited by 1,401
  18. 2017ShuffleNet: An Extremely Efficient Convolutional Neural Network for Mobile Devicescited by 1,194
  19. 2021EfficientNetV2: Smaller Models and Faster Trainingcited by 1,127
  20. 2021Scaling Vision Transformerscited by 993
  21. 2016Deep Networks with Stochastic Depthcited by 973
  22. 2017In Defense of the Triplet Loss for Person Re-Identificationcited by 784
  23. 2018Deformable ConvNets v2: More Deformable, Better Resultscited by 666
  24. 2017Understanding the Effective Receptive Field in Deep Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 549
  25. 2017ThiNet: A Filter Level Pruning Method for Deep Neural Network Compressioncited by 438
  26. 2019GhostNet: More Features from Cheap Operationscited by 410
  27. 2021Rethinking Spatial Dimensions of Vision Transformerscited by 361
  28. 2018Slimmable Neural Networkscited by 301
  29. 2019Progressive Differentiable Architecture Search: Bridging the Depth Gap between Search and Evaluationcited by 230
  30. 2013Maxout Networkscited by 186
  31. 2017Data-Driven Sparse Structure Selection for Deep Neural Networkscited by 181
  32. 2021Revisiting ResNets: Improved Training and Scaling Strategiescited by 158
  33. 2019Fair DARTS: Eliminating Unfair Advantages in Differentiable Architecture Searchcited by 129
  34. 2019DARTS+: Improved Differentiable Architecture Search with Early Stoppingcited by 105
  35. 2017Shift: A Zero FLOP, Zero Parameter Alternative to Spatial Convolutionscited by 93
  36. 2017Residual Connections Encourage Iterative Inferencecited by 74
  37. 2018NSML: Meet the MLaaS platform with a real-world case studycited by 70
  38. 2016Highway and Residual Networks learn Unrolled Iterative Estimationcited by 52

50 most cited of 55 All 55 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

5 papers.