mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Enhancing variational generation through self-decomposition

arXiv 2202.02738 ↗First posted 6 Feb 2022cs.CV cs.NEcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this article we introduce the notion of Split Variational Autoencoder (SVAE), whose output hatx is obtained as a weighted sum σ odot hatx1 + (1-σ) odot hatx2 of two generated images hatx1,hatx2, and σ is a em learned compositional map. The composing images hatx1,hatx2, as well as the σ-map are automatically synthesized by the model. The network is trained as a usual Variational Autoencoder with a negative loglikelihood loss between training and reconstructed images. No additional loss is required for hatx1,hatx2 or σ, neither any form of human tuning. The decomposition is nondeterministic, but follows two main schemes, that we may roughly categorize as either saysyntactic or saysemantic. In the first case, the map tends to exploit the strong correlation between adjacent pixels, splitting the image in two complementary high frequency sub-images. In the second case, the map typically focuses on the contours of objects, splitting the image in interesting variations of its content, with more marked and distinctive features. In this case, according to empirical observations, the Fr'echet Inception Distance (FID) of hatx1 and hatx2 is usually lower (hence better) than that of hatx, that clearly suffers from being the average of the former. In a sense, a SVAE forces the Variational Autoencoder to make choices, in contrast with its intrinsic tendency to em average between alternatives with the aim to minimize the reconstruction loss towards a specific sample. According to the FID metric, our technique, tested on typical datasets such as Mnist, Cifar10 and CelebA, allows us to outperform all previous purely variational architectures (not relying on normalization flows).

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Feb 2022.

Builds on

26 of 39 references.

References · 26

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,451
  3. 2017Squeeze-and-Excitation Networkscited by 4,763
  4. 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,679
  5. 2017Progressive Growing of GANs for Improved Quality, Stability, and Variationcited by 2,967
  6. 2017FiLM: Visual Reasoning with a General Conditioning Layercited by 2,286
  7. 2018Glow: Generative Flow with Invertible 1x1 Convolutionscited by 1,539
  8. 2019An Introduction to Variational Autoencoderscited by 997
  9. 2020NVAE: A Deep Hierarchical Variational Autoencodercited by 635
  10. 2015Importance Weighted Autoencoderscited by 454
  11. 2016Tutorial on Variational Autoencoderscited by 404
  12. 2018Understanding disentangling in β-VAEcited by 332
14 more
  1. 2016NIPS 2016 Tutorial: Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 284
  2. 2019Diagnosing and Enhancing VAE Modelscited by 192
  3. 2019From Variational to Deterministic Autoencoderscited by 131
  4. 2021An Introduction to Deep Generative Modelingcited by 104
  5. 2019Preventing Posterior Collapse with delta-VAEscited by 86
  6. 2020Balancing reconstruction error and Kullback-Leibler divergence in Variational Autoencoderscited by 30
  7. 2021A survey on Variational Autoencoders from a GreenAI perspectivecited by 22
  8. 2018Overpruning in Variational Bayesian Neural Networkscited by 21
  9. 2017Tackling Over-pruning in Variational Autoencoderscited by 14
  10. 2021Dissecting FLOPs along input dimensions for GreenAI cost estimationscited by 10
  11. 2019Blind Deblurring using Deep Learning: A Surveycited by 7
  12. 2020Variational Autoencoders with Normalizing Flow Decoderscited by 7
  13. 2018Sparsity in Variational Autoencoderscited by 6
  14. 2020Variance Loss in Variational Autoencoderscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1.

1 paper.