mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Learning to reason about and to act on physical cascading events

arXiv 2202.01108 ↗First posted 2 Feb 2022cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Reasoning and interacting with dynamic environments is a fundamental problem in AI, but it becomes extremely challenging when actions can trigger cascades of cross-dependent events. We introduce a new supervised learning setup called em Cascade where an agent is shown a video of a physically simulated dynamic scene, and is asked to intervene and trigger a cascade of events, such that the system reaches a "counterfactual" goal. For instance, the agent may be asked to "Make the blue ball hit the red one, by pushing the green ball". The agent intervention is drawn from a continuous space, and cascades of events makes the dynamics highly non-linear. We combine semantic tree search with an event-driven forward model and devise an algorithm that learns to search in semantic trees in continuous spaces. We demonstrate that our approach learns to effectively follow instructions to intervene in previously unseen complex scenes. It can also reason about alternative outcomes, when provided an observed cascade of events.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Feb 2022.

Builds on

25 of 53 references.

References · 25

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2017Deep Setscited by 1,394
  3. 2018Relational inductive biases, deep learning, and graph networkscited by 1,341
  4. 2019Mastering Atari, Go, Chess and Shogi by Planning with a Learned Modelcited by 1,327
  5. 2018Learning Latent Dynamics for Planning from Pixelscited by 1,221
  6. 2016Interaction Networks for Learning about Objects, Relations and Physicscited by 503
  7. 2019CLEVRER: CoLlision Events for Video REpresentation and Reasoningcited by 475
  8. 2019Efficient Off-Policy Meta-Reinforcement Learning via Probabilistic Context Variablescited by 372
  9. 2019PHYRE: A New Benchmark for Physical Reasoningcited by 137
  10. 2019CATER: A diagnostic dataset for Compositional Actions and TEmporal Reasoningcited by 137
  11. 2018Woulda, Coulda, Shoulda: Counterfactually-Guided Policy Searchcited by 81
  12. 2018IntPhys: A Framework and Benchmark for Visual Intuitive Physics Reasoningcited by 72
13 more
  1. 2019Meta-learning of Sequential Strategiescited by 68
  2. 2016Learning Physical Intuition of Block Towers by Examplecited by 66
  3. 2019Rapid trial-and-error learning with simulation supports flexible tool use and physical reasoningcited by 60
  4. 2015Learning Visual Predictive Models of Physics for Playing Billiardscited by 58
  5. 2018Reasoning About Physical Interactions with Object-Oriented Prediction and Planningcited by 51
  6. 2019Structured agents for physical constructioncited by 50
  7. 2019Learning Domain-Independent Planning Heuristics with Hypergraph Networkscited by 50
  8. 2020Learning Long-term Visual Dynamics with Region Proposal Interaction Networkscited by 44
  9. 2020CRAFT: A Benchmark for Causal Reasoning About Forces and inTeractionscited by 44
  10. 2018Time-Agnostic Prediction: Predicting Predictable Video Framescited by 37
  11. 2020Generalization to New Actions in Reinforcement Learningcited by 25
  12. 2020Forward Prediction for Physical Reasoningcited by 18
  13. 2022Federated Learning with Heterogeneous Architectures using Graph HyperNetworkscited by 17

Built on by

Not cited yet.