mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Keyword localisation in untranscribed speech using visually grounded speech models

arXiv 2202.01107 ↗First posted 2 Feb 2022cs.CL cs.SD eess.AScited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Keyword localisation is the task of finding where in a speech utterance a given query keyword occurs. We investigate to what extent keyword localisation is possible using a visually grounded speech (VGS) model. VGS models are trained on unlabelled images paired with spoken captions. These models are therefore self-supervised -- trained without any explicit textual label or location information. To obtain training targets, we first tag training images with soft text labels using a pretrained visual classifier with a fixed vocabulary. This enables a VGS model to predict the presence of a written keyword in an utterance, but not its location. We consider four ways to equip VGS models with localisations capabilities. Two of these -- a saliency approach and input masking -- can be applied to an arbitrary prediction model after training, while the other two -- attention and a score aggregation approach -- are incorporated directly into the structure of the model. Masked-based localisation gives some of the best reported localisation scores from a VGS model, with an accuracy of 57% when the system knows that a keyword occurs in an utterance and need to predict its location. In a setting where localisation is performed after detection, an F1 of 25% is achieved, and in a setting where a keyword spotting ranking pass is first performed, we get a localisation P@10 of 32%. While these scores are modest compared to the idealised setting with unordered bag-of-word-supervision (from transcriptions), these models do not receive any textual or location supervision. Further analyses show that these models are limited by the first detection or ranking pass. Moreover, individual keyword localisation performance is correlated with the tagging performance from the visual classifier. We also show qualitatively how and where semantic mistakes occur, e.g. that the model locates surfer when queried with ocean.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 67 of its 103 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Feb 2022.

Builds on

67 of 103 references.

References · 67

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  3. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  4. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  5. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
  6. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
  7. 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,415
  8. 2016Visual Genome: Connecting Language and Vision Using Crowdsourced Dense Image Annotationscited by 2,646
  9. 2015Learning Deep Features for Discriminative Localizationcited by 2,430
  10. 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,278
  11. 2020Knowledge Distillation: A Surveycited by 1,578
  12. 2021MLP-Mixer: An all-MLP Architecture for Visioncited by 1,441
38 more
  1. 2019SpecAugment: A Simple Data Augmentation Method for Automatic Speech Recognitioncited by 1,355
  2. 2015Flickr30k Entities: Collecting Region-to-Phrase Correspondences for Richer Image-to-Sentence Modelscited by 1,352
  3. 2018Attention-based Deep Multiple Instance Learningcited by 1,077
  4. 2015Effective Approaches to Attention-based Neural Machine Translationcited by 1,024
  5. 2014Deep Visual-Semantic Alignments for Generating Image Descriptionscited by 966
  6. 2018Object Hallucination in Image Captioningcited by 661
  7. 2014Neural Turing Machinescited by 630
  8. 2018The Open Images Dataset V4: Unified image classification, object detection, and visual relationship detection at scalecited by 542
  9. 2013Do Deep Nets Really Need to be Deep?cited by 466
  10. 2016Top-down Neural Attention by Excitation Backpropcited by 318
  11. 2020Self-Supervised MultiModal Versatile Networkscited by 276
  12. 2019Self-Supervised Learning by Cross-Modal Audio-Video Clusteringcited by 264
  13. 2016SoundNet: Learning Sound Representations from Unlabeled Videocited by 244
  14. 2019Connecting Vision and Language with Localized Narrativescited by 225
  15. 2015Cross Modal Distillation for Supervision Transfercited by 173
  16. 2019Taking a HINT: Leveraging Explanations to Make Vision and Language Models More Groundedcited by 127
  17. 2017Sequence-to-Sequence Models Can Directly Translate Foreign Speechcited by 121
  18. 2020AVLnet: Learning Audio-Visual Language Representations from Instructional Videoscited by 110
  19. 2018Neural Baby Talkcited by 107
  20. 2018Jointly Discovering Visual Objects and Spoken Words from Raw Sensory Inputcited by 81
  21. 2016Very Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Raw Waveformscited by 68
  22. 2017Learning Sight from Sound: Ambient Sound Provides Supervision for Visual Learningcited by 67
  23. 2021Multimodal Clustering Networks for Self-supervised Learning from Unlabeled Videoscited by 62
  24. 2020There and Back Again: Revisiting Backpropagation Saliency Methodscited by 60
  25. 2015Deep Multimodal Semantic Embeddings for Speech and Imagescited by 56
  26. 2018Emotion Recognition in Speech using Cross-Modal Transfer in the Wildcited by 48
  27. 2019Learning Hierarchical Discrete Linguistic Units from Visually-Grounded Speechcited by 44
  28. 2017Representations of language in a model of visually grounded speech signalcited by 37
  29. 2016Automatic Description Generation from Images: A Survey of Models, Datasets, and Evaluation Measurescited by 36
  30. 2016Attention Correctness in Neural Image Captioningcited by 35
  31. 2021Visually grounded models of spoken language: A survey of datasets, architectures and evaluation techniquescited by 32
  32. 2017Learning Word-Like Units from Joint Audio-Visual Analysiscited by 27
  33. 2018Vision as an Interlingua: Learning Multilingual Semantic Embeddings of Untranscribed Speechcited by 26
  34. 2021Fast-Slow Transformer for Visually Grounding Speechcited by 23
  35. 2017Query-by-Example Search with Discriminative Neural Acoustic Word Embeddingscited by 22
  36. 2017Semantic speech retrieval with a visually grounded model of untranscribed speechcited by 20
  37. 2018Visually grounded cross-lingual keyword spotting in speechcited by 19
  38. 2017Visually grounded learning of keyword prediction from untranscribed speechcited by 16

50 most cited of 67 All 67 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 4; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.

7 papers.