mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Review of Serial and Parallel Min-Cut/Max-Flow Algorithms for Computer Vision

arXiv 2202.00418 ↗First posted 1 Feb 2022cs.CVcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Minimum cut/maximum flow (min-cut/max-flow) algorithms solve a variety of problems in computer vision and thus significant effort has been put into developing fast min-cut/max-flow algorithms. As a result, it is difficult to choose an ideal algorithm for a given problem. Furthermore, parallel algorithms have not been thoroughly compared. In this paper, we evaluate the state-of-the-art serial and parallel min-cut/max-flow algorithms on the largest set of computer vision problems yet. We focus on generic algorithms, i.e., for unstructured graphs, but also compare with the specialized GridCut implementation. When applicable, GridCut performs best. Otherwise, the two pseudoflow algorithms, Hochbaum pseudoflow and excesses incremental breadth first search, achieves the overall best performance. The most memory efficient implementation tested is the Boykov-Kolmogorov algorithm. Amongst generic parallel algorithms, we find the bottom-up merging approach by Liu and Sun to be best, but no method is dominant. Of the generic parallel methods, only the parallel preflow push-relabel algorithm is able to efficiently scale with many processors across problem sizes, and no generic parallel method consistently outperforms serial algorithms. Finally, we provide and evaluate strategies for algorithm selection to obtain good expected performance. We make our dataset and implementations publicly available for further research.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 113 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Feb 2022.

Builds on

17 of 113 references.

References · 17

  1. 2018UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reductioncited by 2,898
  2. 2021Convex optimizationcited by 2,515
  3. 2016V-Net: Fully Convolutional Neural Networks for Volumetric Medical Image Segmentationcited by 2,292
  4. 20163D U-Net: Learning Dense Volumetric Segmentation from Sparse Annotationcited by 1,476
  5. 2020Image Segmentation Using Deep Learning: A Surveycited by 660
  6. 2019A large annotated medical image dataset for the development and evaluation of segmentation algorithmscited by 373
  7. 2019Embracing Imperfect Datasets: A Review of Deep Learning Solutions for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 260
  8. 2016Simple Does It: Weakly Supervised Instance and Semantic Segmentationcited by 227
  9. 2020Deep Snake for Real-Time Instance Segmentationcited by 112
  10. 2019Voxel2Mesh: 3D Mesh Model Generation from Volumetric Datacited by 53
  11. 2016A Study of Lagrangean Decompositions and Dual Ascent Solvers for Graph Matchingcited by 26
  12. 2014A Comparative Study of Modern Inference Techniques for Structured Discrete Energy Minimization Problemscited by 16
5 more
  1. 2021Fusion Moves for Graph Matchingcited by 16
  2. 2018Deep LOGISMOS: Deep Learning Graph-based 3D Segmentation of Pancreatic Tumors on CT scanscited by 5
  3. 2017Efficient optimization for Hierarchically-structured Interacting Segments (HINTS)cited by 2
  4. 2015Efficient Implementation of a Synchronous Parallel Push-Relabel Algorithmcited by 1
  5. 2015Dynamic Parallel and Distributed Graph Cutscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

2 papers.