mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Generalizing similarity in noisy setups: the DIBS phenomenon

arXiv 2201.12803 ↗First posted 30 Jan 2022cs.LG cs.AI cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This work uncovers an interplay among data density, noise, and the generalization ability in similarity learning. We consider Siamese Neural Networks (SNNs), which are the basic form of contrastive learning, and explore two types of noise that can impact SNNs, Pair Label Noise (PLN) and Single Label Noise (SLN). Our investigation reveals that SNNs exhibit double descent behaviour regardless of the training setup and that it is further exacerbated by noise. We demonstrate that the density of data pairs is crucial for generalization. When SNNs are trained on sparse datasets with the same amount of PLN or SLN, they exhibit comparable generalization properties. However, when using dense datasets, PLN cases generalize worse than SLN ones in the overparametrized region, leading to a phenomenon we call Density-Induced Break of Similarity (DIBS). In this regime, PLN similarity violation becomes macroscopical, corrupting the dataset to the point where complete interpolation cannot be achieved, regardless of the number of model parameters. Our analysis also delves into the correspondence between online optimization and offline generalization in similarity learning. The results show that this equivalence fails in the presence of label noise in all the scenarios considered.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 39 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Jan 2022.

Builds on

39 of 54 references.

References · 39

  1. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
  2. 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,662
  3. 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,482
  4. 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,712
  5. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
  6. 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,231
  7. 2020Supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 2,803
  8. 2019Contrastive Multiview Codingcited by 1,297
  9. 2018Reconciling modern machine learning practice and the bias-variance trade-offcited by 919
  10. 2019Learning Representations by Maximizing Mutual Information Across Viewscited by 733
  11. 2020Self-supervised Learning: Generative or Contrastivecited by 693
  12. 2019Deep Double Descent: Where Bigger Models and More Data Hurtcited by 667
27 more
  1. 2020Learning from Noisy Labels with Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 580
  2. 2020A Survey on Contrastive Self-supervised Learningcited by 553
  3. 2019The generalization error of random features regression: Precise asymptotics and double descent curvecited by 410
  4. 2020Hard Negative Mixing for Contrastive Learningcited by 399
  5. 2020Understanding the Behaviour of Contrastive Losscited by 397
  6. 2020Debiased Contrastive Learningcited by 354
  7. 2020Keystroke Dynamics as Part of Lifeloggingcited by 334
  8. 2019Unsupervised Label Noise Modeling and Loss Correctioncited by 327
  9. 2020Supervised Contrastive Learning for Pre-trained Language Model Fine-tuningcited by 275
  10. 2017EMNIST: an extension of MNIST to handwritten letterscited by 212
  11. 2018Learning to Learn from Noisy Labeled Datacited by 160
  12. 2020Demystifying Contrastive Self-Supervised Learning: Invariances, Augmentations and Dataset Biasescited by 143
  13. 2019Deep Self-Learning From Noisy Labelscited by 122
  14. 2020Boosting Contrastive Self-Supervised Learning with False Negative Cancellationcited by 119
  15. 2021Can contrastive learning avoid shortcut solutions?cited by 114
  16. 2020Optimal Regularization Can Mitigate Double Descentcited by 107
  17. 2020Double Trouble in Double Descent : Bias and Variance(s) in the Lazy Regimecited by 95
  18. 2021Robust Audio-Visual Instance Discriminationcited by 80
  19. 2018A jamming transition from under- to over-parametrization affects loss landscape and generalizationcited by 65
  20. 2020Triple descent and the two kinds of overfitting: Where & why do they appear?cited by 64
  21. 2022Robust Contrastive Learning against Noisy Viewscited by 45
  22. 2020A Brief Prehistory of Double Descentcited by 44
  23. 2021Improving Contrastive Learning by Visualizing Feature Transformationcited by 44
  24. 2020Early Stopping in Deep Networks: Double Descent and How to Eliminate itcited by 40
  25. 2020Improving Generalization by Controlling Label-Noise Information in Neural Network Weightscited by 35
  26. 2021Multi-scale Feature Learning Dynamics: Insights for Double Descentcited by 24
  27. 2021Model, sample, and epoch-wise descents: exact solution of gradient flow in the random feature modelcited by 17

Built on by

Not cited yet.