mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Zeroth-Order Actor-Critic: An Evolutionary Framework for Sequential Decision Problems

arXiv 2201.12518 ↗First posted 29 Jan 2022cs.LG cs.AI cs.SYcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Evolutionary algorithms (EAs) have shown promise in solving sequential decision problems (SDPs) by simplifying them to static optimization problems and searching for the optimal policy parameters in a zeroth-order way. While these methods are highly versatile, they often suffer from high sample complexity due to their ignorance of the underlying temporal structures. In contrast, reinforcement learning (RL) methods typically formulate SDPs as Markov Decision Process (MDP). Although more sample efficient than EAs, RL methods are restricted to differentiable policies and prone to getting stuck in local optima. To address these issues, we propose a novel evolutionary framework Zeroth-Order Actor-Critic (ZOAC). We propose to use step-wise exploration in parameter space and theoretically derive the zeroth-order policy gradient. We further utilize the actor-critic architecture to effectively leverage the Markov property of SDPs and reduce the variance of gradient estimators. In each iteration, ZOAC employs samplers to collect trajectories with parameter space exploration, and alternates between first-order policy evaluation (PEV) and zeroth-order policy improvement (PIM). To evaluate the effectiveness of ZOAC, we apply it to a challenging multi-lane driving task, optimizing the parameters in a rule-based, non-differentiable driving policy that consists of three sub-modules: behavior selection, path planning, and trajectory tracking. We also compare it with gradient-based RL methods on three Gymnasium tasks, optimizing neural network policies with thousands of parameters. Experimental results demonstrate the strong capability of ZOAC in solving SDPs. ZOAC significantly outperforms EAs that treat the problem as static optimization and matches the performance of gradient-based RL methods even without first-order information, in terms of total average return across all tasks.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 85 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jan 2022.

Builds on

31 of 85 references.

References · 31

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  2. 2015Continuous control with deep reinforcement learningcited by 3,279
  3. 2018Addressing Function Approximation Error in Actor-Critic Methodscited by 2,302
  4. 2016Asynchronous Methods for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 2,218
  5. 2015High-Dimensional Continuous Control Using Generalized Advantage Estimationcited by 1,916
  6. 2017Evolution Strategies as a Scalable Alternative to Reinforcement Learningcited by 555
  7. 2017Ray: A Distributed Framework for Emerging AI Applicationscited by 516
  8. 2017Noisy Networks for Explorationcited by 262
  9. 2017Parameter Space Noise for Explorationcited by 158
  10. 2017Deep Neuroevolution: Genetic Algorithms Are a Competitive Alternative for Training Deep Neural Networks for Reinforcement Learningcited by 148
  11. 2017Backpropagation through the Void: Optimizing control variates for black-box gradient estimationcited by 104
  12. 2018Evolution-Guided Policy Gradient in Reinforcement Learningcited by 78
19 more
  1. 2019A Theoretical and Empirical Comparison of Gradient Approximations in Derivative-Free Optimizationcited by 66
  2. 2018Derivative-Free Methods for Policy Optimization: Guarantees for Linear Quadratic Systemscited by 56
  3. 2018CEM-RL: Combining evolutionary and gradient-based methods for policy searchcited by 53
  4. 2018Structured Evolution with Compact Architectures for Scalable Policy Optimizationcited by 48
  5. 2020Smooth Exploration for Robotic Reinforcement Learningcited by 45
  6. 2021On-Policy Deep Reinforcement Learning for the Average-Reward Criterioncited by 29
  7. 2021Integrated Decision and Control: Towards Interpretable and Computationally Efficient Driving Intelligencecited by 25
  8. 2017ES Is More Than Just a Traditional Finite-Difference Approximatorcited by 24
  9. 2019Proximal Distilled Evolutionary Reinforcement Learningcited by 24
  10. 2019Deep Neuroevolution of Recurrent and Discrete World Modelscited by 22
  11. 2020From Pixels to Legs: Hierarchical Learning of Quadruped Locomotioncited by 20
  12. 2016Particle Swarm Optimization for Generating Interpretable Fuzzy Reinforcement Learning Policiescited by 19
  13. 2021Global Convergence and Stability of Stochastic Gradient Descentcited by 17
  14. 2020Numerically Stable Dynamic Bicycle Model for Discrete-time Controlcited by 15
  15. 2020Learning to Guide Random Searchcited by 13
  16. 2020Towards Interpretable-AI Policies Induction using Evolutionary Nonlinear Decision Trees for Discrete Action Systemscited by 12
  17. 2021Optimal Cost Design for Model Predictive Controlcited by 12
  18. 2018Policy Search in Continuous Action Domains: an Overviewcited by 10
  19. 2021Encoding Distributional Soft Actor-Critic for Autonomous Driving in Multi-lane Scenarioscited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026EVOM: Agentic Meta-Evolution of Actor-Critic Architectures for Reinforcement Learning
  2. 2024Primitive Agentic First-Order Optimization
  3. 2025Actor-Critic without Actor
  4. 2026A Pontryagin Method of Model-based Reinforcement Learning via Hamiltonian Actor-Critic
  5. 2021Provable Benefits of Actor-Critic Methods for Offline Reinforcement Learning
  6. 2024Distributional Successor Features Enable Zero-Shot Policy Optimization
  7. 2023Zeroth-Order Optimization Meets Human Feedback: Provable Learning via Ranking Oracles
  8. 2023BiERL: A Meta Evolutionary Reinforcement Learning Framework via Bilevel Optimization