Little Help Makes a Big Difference: Leveraging Active Learning to Improve Unsupervised Time Series Anomaly Detection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Key Performance Indicators (KPI), which are essentially time series data, have been widely used to indicate the performance of telecom networks. Based on the given KPIs, a large set of anomaly detection algorithms have been deployed for detecting the unexpected network incidents. Generally, unsupervised anomaly detection algorithms gain more popularity than the supervised ones, due to the fact that labeling KPIs is extremely time- and resource-consuming, and error-prone. However, those unsupervised anomaly detection algorithms often suffer from excessive false alarms, especially in the presence of concept drifts resulting from network re-configurations or maintenance. To tackle this challenge and improve the overall performance of unsupervised anomaly detection algorithms, we propose to use active learning to introduce and benefit from the feedback of operators, who can verify the alarms (both false and true ones) and label the corresponding KPIs with reasonable effort. Specifically, we develop three query strategies to select the most informative and representative samples to label. We also develop an efficient method to update the weights of Isolation Forest and optimally adjust the decision threshold, so as to eventually improve the performance of detection model. The experiments with one public dataset and one proprietary dataset demonstrate that our active learning empowered anomaly detection pipeline could achieve performance gain, in terms of F1-score, more than 50% over the baseline algorithm. It also outperforms the existing active learning based methods by approximately 6%-10%, with significantly reduced budget (the ratio of samples to be labeled).
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Jan 2022.
Builds on
6 of 20 references.
References · 6
- 2019Deep Semi-Supervised Anomaly Detectioncited by 290
- 2018Unsupervised Anomaly Detection via Variational Auto-Encoder for Seasonal KPIs in Web Applicationscited by 223
- 2019Time-Series Anomaly Detection Service at Microsoftcited by 163
- 2014Toward Supervised Anomaly Detectioncited by 73
- 2021Neural Contextual Anomaly Detection for Time Seriescited by 42
- 2019Effectiveness of Tree-based Ensembles for Anomaly Discovery: Insights, Batch and Streaming Active Learningcited by 9
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
4 papers.
- 2023Expert enhanced dynamic time warping based anomaly detectioncited by 0
- 2025DQS: A Low-Budget Query Strategy for Enhancing Unsupervised Data-driven Anomaly Detection Approachescited by 0
- 2026Detecting the Undetectable: Enhancing Unsupervised time series Anomaly Detection via Active Learningcited by 0
- 2026Training-Free Human-in-the-Loop Anomaly Detection via Memory Bank Correctioncited by 0
- 2026Training-Free Human-in-the-Loop Anomaly Detection via Memory Bank Correction18 Aug 2026
- 2026Detecting the Undetectable: Enhancing Unsupervised time series Anomaly Detection via Active Learning1 Jul 2026
- 2025DQS: A Low-Budget Query Strategy for Enhancing Unsupervised Data-driven Anomaly Detection Approaches6 Sep 2025
- 2023Expert enhanced dynamic time warping based anomaly detection2 Oct 2023